Abstract
AbstractFollowing a series of complimentary studies assessing the current application of the principle of transparency of consumer information in Croatia, Germany, Poland, the Netherlands, and the UK, this paper presents research findings on how to improve its effectiveness. Documented differences in national laws and practice indicate the need for a more harmonised approach on the level of the European Union. This demand also arises from the interviews the research team has conducted with various national stakeholders. Whilst the legislative transparency requirements could remain general, e.g., a duty for traders to provide consumer information in “plain and intelligible language,” traders, consumers, and enforcement authorities all require more legal certainty as to what amounts to compliance with these requirements. Based on the stakeholders’ suggestions, an interdisciplinary literature review, findings from doctrinal, comparative legal research, and a conducted quantitative study, the paper recommends empirically motivated, multimodal guidelines to implement textual, contextual, and technical measures.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference60 articles.
1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.
2. Armbrüster, Ch. (2004). Das Transparenzgebot für Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen nach der Schuldrechtsmodernisierung. Deutsche Notar-Zeitschrift, 437–439.
3. Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F., & Trossen, D. R. (2014). Does anyone read the fine print? Consumer attention to standard-form contracts. The Journal of Legal Studies, 43, 1–35.
4. Benoliel, U., & Becher, S. I. (2019). The duty to read the unreadable. Boston College Law Review, 60(8), 2255–2296.
5. Ben-Shahar, O., & Chilton, A. (2016). Simplification of privacy disclosures: An experimental test. Journal of Legal Studies, 45, 41–67.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献