Abstract
AbstractA key change since the financial crisis of 2008 is the internationalization of interest in consumer finance. International institutions monitor household credit because of its impact on financial stability and market expansion. Macroprudential concerns drove this interest, resulting in a sea change in approaches to consumer credit regulation in many jurisdictions. This article critically analyses the emerging international policy paradigm, contrasting pre-and post-crisis regulatory approaches and highlighting continuing tensions about key policy choices. It then uses two recent sites of contestation, debt adjustment and the regulation of high-cost credit to demostrate the persistence of conflict over the positioning of consumers within an emergent stability focused paradigm of financial consumer protection.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference93 articles.
1. Ahmed, R., & Ibrahim, I. (2018). Financial consumer protection regime in Malaysia: Assessment of the legal and regulatory framework. Journal of Consumer Policy, 41 (2), 159–175.
2. Barba, A. & Pivetti, M. (2009). Rising household debt: Its causes and macro-economic implications—a long term analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 113-137)
3. Björkegren, D. & Grissen, D. (2018). The potential of digital credit to bank the poor. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 108, 68-71.
4. Bruckner, M. (2018). The promise and perils of algorithmic lenders’ use of big data. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 93(1), 1-60.
5. Caplovitz, D. (1963). The poor pay more. New York, NY: Free Press.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献