Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference6 articles.
1. Empfehlungen zur Konsiliar- und Zweitbefundung in der Pathologie des Berufsverbandes Deutscher Pathologen und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie (Stand: 3. Sept. 2010) http://www.pathologie-dgp.de/media/Dgp/downloads/Rubrik_Downloads/Empfehlungen_Konsil_2010.pdf . Zugegriffen: 9.1.2017
2. Elmore JG, Longton GM, Carney PA, Geller BM, Onega T, Tosteson AN, Nelson HD, Pepe MS, Allison KH, Schnitt SJ, O’Malley FP, Weaver DL (2015) Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. JAMA 313(11):1122–1132
3. Khazai L, Middleton LP, Goktepe N, Liu BT, Sahin AA (2015) Breast pathology second review identifies clinically significant discrepancies in over 10 % of patients. J Surg Oncol 111(2):192–197
4. Kronz JD, Westra WH, Epstein JI (1999) Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital. Cancer 86(11):2426–2435
5. Lapeyrere N, Parrens M, Coindre JM, Soubeyran I, de Mascarel A, Merlio JP, Lebail B, Lepreux S, Jaffre A, Gilleron V, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Vergier B, A. le Groupe des anatomopathologistes (2008) Impact of pathological review by an expert on the diagnosis and management of patients with cancer in Aquitania. Ann Pathol 28(6):478–485