Abstract
AbstractEven if attributes such as being social, smart, autonomous or intelligent are too ambitious in ontological terms, ‘social’ robots, ‘smart’ agents, ‘autonomous’ vehicles and comparable machines demonstrate a non-trivial mode of automatization. This mode requires the human counterpart to develop a pragmatic understanding of the role, the function and the type of behaviour of such machines. Based on this problem, the article addresses the communicative relevance of design elements such as appearance and behavioural stylisation as well as the use of sign systems in order to create social accountability. The aim is to identify the taxonomies or role figures to which non-trivial machines are socially assigned through their design and which are further differentiated with the development of new designs. This, however, presupposes a fundamental sociological understanding of the structure and function of such displays. The present article and the analytical concept of social displays pursue this intermediated objective.
Funder
Technische Universität Chemnitz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Elias, Norbert. 2000. Was ist Soziologie? 11th edn., Weinheim, München: Juventa.
2. Esposito, Elena. 2017. Artificial communication? The production of contingency by algorithms. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 46(4):249–265.
3. Fink, Robin D., and Johannes Weyer. 2013. Interaction of human actors and non-human agents. A sociological simulation model of hybrid systems. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 10(1):47–64.
4. Firestone, William A. 1993. Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher 22(4):16–23.
5. von Foerster, Heinz. 2019. Wissen und Gewissen: Versuch einer Brücke. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献