Author:
Song Yufei,Gordon Pedro C.,Metsomaa Johanna,Rostami Maryam,Belardinelli Paolo,Ziemann Ulf
Abstract
AbstractTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)–evoked electroencephalography (EEG) potentials (TEPs) provide unique insights into cortical excitability and connectivity. However, confounding EEG signals from auditory and somatosensory co-stimulation complicate TEP interpretation. Our optimized sham procedure established with TMS of primary motor cortex (Gordon in JAMA 245:118708, 2021) differentiates direct cortical EEG responses to TMS from those caused by peripheral sensory inputs. Using this approach, this study aimed to investigate TEPs and their test–retest reliability when targeting regions outside the primary motor cortex, specifically the left angular gyrus, supplementary motor area, and medial prefrontal cortex. We conducted three identical TMS–EEG sessions one week apart involving 24 healthy participants. In each session, we targeted the three areas separately using a figure-of-eight TMS coil for active TMS, while a second coil away from the head produced auditory input for sham TMS. Masking noise and electric scalp stimulation were applied in both conditions to achieve matched EEG responses to peripheral sensory inputs. High test–retest reliability was observed in both conditions. However, reliability declined for the ‘cleaned’ TEPs, resulting from the subtraction of evoked EEG response to the sham TMS from those to the active, particularly for latencies > 100 ms following the TMS pulse. Significant EEG differences were found between active and sham TMS at latencies < 90 ms for all targeted areas, exhibiting distinct spatiotemporal characteristics specific to each target. In conclusion, our optimized sham procedure effectively reveals EEG responses to direct cortical activation by TMS in brain areas outside primary motor cortex. Moreover, we demonstrate the impact of peripheral sensory inputs on test–retest reliability of TMS-EEG responses.
Funder
China Scholarship Council
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology,Anatomy
Reference54 articles.
1. Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 325(8437):1106–1107
2. Belardinelli P, Biabani M, Blumberger DM, Bortoletto M, Casarotto S, David O, Desideri D, Etkin A, Ferrarelli F, Fitzgerald PB et al (2019) Reproducibility in TMS–EEG studies: a call for data sharing, standard procedures and effective experimental control. Brain Stimul Basic Transl Clin Res Neuromodulation 12(3):787–790
3. Bertazzoli G, Esposito R, Mutanen TP, Ferrari C, Ilmoniemi RJ, Bortoletto M (2021) The impact of artifact removal approaches on TMS-EEG signal 1. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.15.426817
4. Biabani M, Fornito A, Mutanen TP, Morrow J, Rogasch NC (2019) Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 12(6):1537–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.009
5. Blair RC, Karniski W (1993) An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. Psychophysiology 30(5):518–524
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献