Similarities and differences in Swiss general practices with and without nurse practitioners

Author:

Schlunegger Margarithe Charlotte,Palm Rebecca,Zumstein-Shaha Maya

Abstract

Abstract Background New care models are needed for the increasing elderly, chronically ill, and multimorbid population, especially in primary healthcare. Rural regions are particularly affected where bottlenecks in provision of care and a shortage of health professionals are emerging. To address these challenges, nurse practitioners have been implemented in Swiss general practices to improve primary healthcare of chronically ill people. Aim We aimed to explore Swiss primary healthcare delivery for chronically ill people in general practices with and without nurse practitioners and identify similarities and differences in these general practices. Methods We conducted multiple case studies. Data were collected using interviews, observations, patient records, and questionnaires. We described the similarities and differences by drawing on Wagner’s Chronic Care Model and applied deductive thematic cross-case analysis. We included five general practices located in rural areas in Switzerland, with nurse practitioners in two general practices. A total of 34 patients and 26 health professionals were included. The Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) reporting standards for organizational case studies were used. Results Similarities were that chronically ill patients valued to be perceived as a whole person; guidelines for multimorbidity and reimbursement of relevant services such as coordination were limited. Differences in general practices with nurse practitioners were unclear role allocation, criteria for patient referral were missing and interprofessional teams were in an extended process of change. Nurse practitioners provided a bridge between the general practices and local home healthcare organizations, thereby, strengthening interface management and obtaining a more comprehensive nursing perspective. Conclusion This study highlights that new models of care can better respond to patients’ needs as additional nursing skills are available. Interprofessional teams undergo substantial changes in the new care model requiring a revision of existing structures.

Funder

Bern University of Applied Sciences

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference47 articles.

1. Barnes, H., Richards, M. R., McHugh, M. D., & Martsolf, G. (2018). Rural and nonrural primary care physician practices increasingly rely on nurse practitioners. Health Affairs, 37(6), 908–914. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1158.

2. Begley, C., Murphy, K., Higgins, A., Elliott, N., Lalor, J., Sheerin, F., Coyne, I., Comiskey, C., Normand, C., Casey, C., Dowling, M., Devane, D., Cooney, A., Farrelly, F., Brennan, M., Meskell, P., & MacNeela, P. (2010). Evaluation of clinical nurse and midwife specialist and advanced nurse and midwife practitioner roles in Ireland (SCAPE) Final Report. http://www.tara.tcd.ie/handle/2262/68341

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

4. Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care, 7(2), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/082585979100700202.

5. Bryant-Lukosius, D., Callens, B., De Geest, S., Degen Kellerhals, S., Fliedner, M., Grossmann, F., Henry, M., Herrmann, L., Koller, A., Martin, J., Schwendimann, R., Spichiger, E., Stoll, H., Ulrich, A., & Weibel, L. (2016a). Advanced nursing practice roles in Switzerland: a proposed framework for evaluation. Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel. http://www.swiss-anp.ch/fileadmin/2_ANP-Wissen_Forschung/PEPPA_Plus_final_Version.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3