Experiencing the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer as an acute threat: a grounded theory study on the diagnostic process of people with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
-
Published:2024-01-15
Issue:1-2
Volume:15
Page:8-17
-
ISSN:2190-2100
-
Container-title:HeilberufeScience
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:HBScience
Author:
Ristau PatrickORCID, Oetting-Roß ClaudiaORCID, Büscher AndreasORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pancreatic cancer is usually diagnosed late and at an advanced stage. Thus, cure is not possible in most cases and the prognosis is often poor.
Objective
This article explores how people with pancreatic cancer experience their diagnostic process.
Methods
Twenty problem-centered interviews with people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer were conducted and analyzed using grounded theory methodology.
Results
We identified a multicausal central phenomenon: people experience the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer as an acute (life) threat. Communication of the diagnosis initiates a process of consideration, self-reflection, and negotiation. It leads to either being unable to handle the diagnosis or to its acceptance, questioning, or rejection. Prognostically unfavorable findings are not accepted as such at first. This process results in rapid treatment initiation or in seeking a second medical opinion.
Conclusion
This paper provides a model of the diagnostic experience of people with pancreatic cancer. In the early phase after diagnosis, neither shared decision-making nor best supportive care strategies appear to be effective. In the future, this knowledge may be used to develop targeted interventions which could be applied during the diagnostic process and support patients.
Funder
Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Anderson, E. M., Thomassian, S., Gong, J., Hendifar, A., & Osipov, A. (2021). Advances in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treatment. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13215510. 2. Breckenridge, J., & Jones, D. (2009). Demystifying theoretical sampling in grounded theory research. Grounded Theory Review, 8(2), . http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2009/06/30/847. 3. Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939. 4. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th edn.). SAGE. 5. Dagenais, G. R., Leong, D. P., Rangarajan, S., Lanas, F., Lopez-Jaramillo, P., Gupta, R., Diaz, R., Avezum, A., Oliveira, G. B. F., Wielgosz, A., Parambath, S. R., Mony, P., Alhabib, K. F., Temizhan, A., Ismail, N., Chifamba, J., Yeates, K., Khatib, R., Rahman, O., & Yusuf, S. (2020). Variations in common diseases, hospital admissions, and deaths in middle-aged adults in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. The Lancet, 395(10226), 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32007-0.
|
|