Gender differences in cortical morphological networks
-
Published:2019-05-17
Issue:5
Volume:14
Page:1831-1839
-
ISSN:1931-7557
-
Container-title:Brain Imaging and Behavior
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Brain Imaging and Behavior
Author:
Nebli Ahmed, Rekik IslemORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Cortical morphological networks (CMN), where each network models the relationship in morphology between different cortical brain regions quantified using a specific measurement (e.g., cortical thickness), have not been investigated with respect to gender differences in the human brain. Cortical processes are expected to involve complex interactions between different brain regions, univariate methods thus might overlook informative gender markers. Hence, by leveraging machine learning techniques with the potential to highlight multivariate interacting effects, we found that the most discriminative CMN connections between males and females were derived from the left hemisphere using the mean sulcal depth as measurement. However, for both left and right hemispheres, the first most discriminative morphological connection revealed across all cortical attributes involved (entorhinal cortex ↔ caudal anterior cingulate cortex) and (entorhinal cortex ↔ transverse temporal cortex) respectively, which gives us new insights into behavioral gender differences from an omics perspective and might explain why males and females learn differently.
Funder
University of Dundee
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Psychiatry and Mental health,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Clinical Neurology,Cognitive Neuroscience,Neurology,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference40 articles.
1. Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologic, 45(7), 1363–1377. 2. Bell, E. C., Willson, M. C., Wilman, A. H., Dave, S., & Silverstone, P. H. (2006). Males and females differ in brain activation during cognitive tasks. Neuroimage, 30(2), 529–538. 3. Boisgueheneuc, F. D., Levy, R., Volle, E., Seassau, M., Duffau, H., Kinkingnehun, S., Samson, Y., Zhang, S., & Dubois, B. (2006). Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: a lesion study. Brain, 129(12), 3315–3328. 4. R. Buckner, M. Hollinshead, A. Holmes, D. Brohawn, J. Fagerness, T. OKeefe, J. Roffman, The brain genomics superstruct project, Harvard Dataverse Network (2012). 5. Chang, E. F., Rieger, J. W., Johnson, K., Berger, M. S., Barbaro, N. M., & Knight, R. T. (2010). Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nature Neuroscience, 13(11), 1428–1432.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|