Abstract
AbstractIn this paper we introduce the plurality kth social choice function selecting an alternative, which is ranked kth in the social ranking following the number of top positions of alternatives in the individual ranking of voters. As special case the plurality 1st is the same as the well-known plurality rule. Concerning individual manipulability, we show that the larger k the more preference profiles are individually manipulable. We also provide maximal non-manipulable domains for the plurality kth rules. These results imply analogous statements on the single non-transferable vote rule. We propose a decomposition of social choice functions based on plurality kth rules, which we apply for determining non-manipulable subdomains for arbitrary social choice functions. We further show that with the exception of the plurality rule all other plurality kth rules are group manipulable, i.e. coordinated misrepresentation of individual rankings are beneficial for each group member, with an appropriately selected tie-breaking rule on the set of all profiles.
Funder
Ministry of Innovation and Technology, Hungary
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference20 articles.
1. Arrow KA (1963) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York
2. Aleskerov F, Kurbanov E (1999) Degree of manipulability of social choice procedures. In: Alkan A et al (eds) Current trends in economics. Springer, Berlin
3. Barbie M, Puppe C, Tasnádi A (2006) Non-manipulable domains for the borda count. Econ Theory 27:411–430
4. Bednay D, Moskalenko A, Tasnádi A (2017) Does avoiding bad voting rules lead to the good ones? Oper Res Lett 45:448–451
5. Eǧecioǧlu Ö, Giritligil AE (2013) The impartial, anonymous, and neutral culture model: a probability model for sampling public preference structures. J Math Soc 37:203–222