Abstract
AbstractThe qualification process of pressure vessels in general is subject to governmental restrictions. Thus, introducing additive manufacturing (AM) components to the market is challenging due to incomplete standardization. To increase component safety and trust, predetermined points of failure can be integrated by design using direct manufacturing methods. A predetermined point of failure using a surface notch is one option to avoid dangerous part failure (e.g. explosion) and increase safety. For implementation, a design approach with experimental proof of concept is striven to guide manufacturers and demonstrate the behavior of the material and the component as a whole. Finite element analysis is used for investigations on the influence of surface notch geometries applied to wall structures on structural stress super-elevation. Analytical strength assessment using FKM guideline and experimental validation of PBF-LB/M-manufactured specimen behavior by static axial tensile and burst testing is carried out. Fracture surface and plastic elongation evaluation using light microscopy and 3-D surface scanning clarify the material behavior. The analytical and experimental approval of an integrated predetermined point of failure for static overload is achieved without reducing the maximum burst pressure value. The integration fulfills all theoretical requirements for structural strength. All tested specimens meet the expectations regarding static strength and failure behavior. As expected, component elongation decreases using surface notches for failure provocation. Results lead to a proposed guideline for the application of an integrated predetermined point of failure by the use of a surface notch.
Funder
AiF Projekt
Fraunhofer-Institut für Gießerei-, Composite und Verarbeitungstechnik IGCV
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Reference17 articles.
1. Wohlers T, Campbell RI, Diegel O, Kowen J, Mostow N (2021) Wohlers report 2021: 3D printing and additive manufacturing : global state of the industry. Fort Collins, Colorado: Wohlers Associates.
2. Bajaj P, Hariharan A, Kini A, Kürnsteiner P, Raabe D, Jägle EA (2020) “Steels in additive manufacturing: A review of their microstructure and properties. Mater Sci Eng A 772:138633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138633
3. Taylor HC, Garibay EA, Wicker RB (2021) “Toward a common laser powder bed fusion qualification test artefact. Addit Manuf 39:101803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101803
4. Schneck M, Schmitt M, Schlick G (2020) Supply Chain and Cost Evaluation for Laser Powder Bed Fusion, In: 2020 IEEE 10th International Conference Nanomaterials: Applications & Properties (NAP), Sumy, Ukraine, Nov. 2020 - Nov. 2020, 02SAMA14-1-02SAMA14-6, https://doi.org/10.1109/NAP51477.2020.9309677.
5. DIN EN 13445–3:2021–12, Unbefeuerte Druckbehälter_- Teil_3: Konstruktion; Deutsche Fassung EN_13445–3:2021, nur auf CD-ROM, Berlin
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献