Productivity drivers and pro-productivity policies: G20 economies, India and South Korea

Author:

van Ark BartORCID,Pilat Dirk

Abstract

AbstractIn this article we look at productivity trends, drivers of productivity growth and pro-productivity policies across the G20 economies since 1970. We distinguish between three sub-groups of G20 economies: a “leading but slowing” group of the most developed economies, a “lagging but growing” group of economies that have shown rapid growth and a “muddling through” group of economies with no sustained improvement in productivity performance. We find distinctly different dynamics between the sub-groups regarding the contributions of capital deepening and total factor productivity (TFP) to labour productivity growth. The slowdown in labour productivity growth since the 2010s has been underpinned by lower TFP growth. India is the only G20 economy which has experienced a significant improvement in TFP growth over the past few decades. We develop a typology distinguishing five domains of pro-productivity policies (accumulation of the factors of production, markets and resource allocation, technological and structural change, internationalisation, and foundational policies) and explore how these have been applied across countries and over time. We also provide a more detailed analysis of productivity and related policies for two G20 countries: India and South Korea. We argue that a revival of productivity growth in the G20 requires a greater focus on policies which balance technological progress with knowledge diffusion; more investment in intangibles and public assets; and improvements in the quality of human capital.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference58 articles.

1. Abramovitz, M. (1993), “The search for the sources of growth: areas of ignorance, old and new”, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 53, pp. 217– 243, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2122171.

2. Dieppe, A. (ed.) (2020), Global Productivity: Trends, Drivers, and Policies, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34015

3. Albrizio, S. and G. Nicoletti (2016), “Boosting Productivity: A Framework for Analysis and a Checklist for Policy”, Background Paper, OECD Global Forum on Productivity, Lisbon, https://www.oecd.org/global-forum-productivity/events/Boosting%20Productivity.pdf

4. Balakrishnan, P. (2010). Economic growth in India: History & Prospect. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198065470.001.0001

5. Banga, R. and B. Goldar (2004), “Contribution of services to output growth and productivity in Indian manufacturing: Pre and post reforms”, Working Paper No. 139, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, Delhi.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3