Abstract
AbstractIt is well known that inequality has been rising in India in the recent past, but the assumption has been that while the rich benefit more than proportionally from economic growth, the poor are also better off than before. Our modelled outcomes (using the RGBM framework) cast doubt on this proposition. We find that the income share dynamics are consistent with a negative reallocation since the early 2000s, i.e., the Indian income distribution possibly entered a regime of perverse redistribution of resources from the poor to the rich. Our model suggests that the historically low-income shares of the bottom decile (~ 1%) and bottom percentile (~ 0.03%) are possibly due to a decline in real incomes in the 2000s. We find qualified support for these theoretical predictions using income distribution data. We characterize these findings in the context of increasing informalization of the workforce in the formal manufacturing and service sectors as well as the growing economic insecurity of the agricultural workforce in India. Significant structural changes will be required to address this phenomenon.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Economics and Econometrics
Reference77 articles.
1. Adams, R., Jr. (2004). Economic growth, inequality and poverty: Estimating the growth elasticity of poverty. World Development, 32(12), 1989–2014.
2. Ahmed, S., & Bhattacharya, S. (2017). Size distribution of percapita personal income in India, Poverty and Income distribution in India. In B. S. Banerjee, Poverty and Income distribution in India (pp. 143–166). Juggernaut.
3. Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490.
4. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2017). Global inequality dynamics: New findings from WID.world. NBER WP Series 23119.
5. Alvarez-Nogal, C., & Prados de la Escosura, L. (2013). The rise and fall of Spain (1270–1850). The Economic History Review, 66(1), 37.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献