Abstract
AbstractThis study investigates the effect of foster care relative to residential group care on enrollment in upper secondary education among Danish children in out-of-home care who were placed out of home at the age six to 14 years (n = 4530). We address the proposition that children placed in family foster care generally have less severe emotional and/or behavioral problems than children placed in residential group care by utilizing a variation in the municipalities’ relative use of foster care among all children placed in out-of-home care. We find evidence that children living in municipalities with a high inclination to use foster care will be more likely to enroll in upper secondary education (p = 0.004). When splitting the sample by gender, we see that the effects are significant only among girls. When looking at potential mechanisms, we find that children in foster care are more likely to attend the school-leaving exams after lower secondary school, while we find no effect on the average standardized test score in the school-leaving exams. As with the main results, these findings apply to the girls only.
Funder
Ministry of Social Affairs and Senior Citizens.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Life-span and Life-course Studies,Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference49 articles.
1. Ammermueller, A., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from the progress in international reading literacy study. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 315–348.
2. Andersen, S. H., & Fallesen, P. (2015). Family matters? The effect of kinship care on foster care disruption rates. Child Abuse & Neglect, 48, 68–79.
3. Barger, M. M., Kim, E. M., Kuncel, N. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2019). The relation between parents’ involvement in children’s schooling and children’s adjustment: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 855.
4. Barth, R. P. (2002). Institutions vs. foster Homes: The empirical base for a century of action. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Social Work, Jordan Institute for Families.
5. Barth, R. P. (2005). Foster home care is more cost-effective than shelter care: serious questions continue to be raised about the utility of group care in child welfare services. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(6), 623–625.