Abstract
AbstractThe paper investigates processes and consequences of ‘philanthropic kinning’, that is the use of kinship and family idioms in constructing and maintaining personal relations between donors and recipients in philanthropy. Usual studies collapse the occurrence of kinship metaphors in philanthropy either as evidence of ‘prosociality’ (e.g. trust, care or love) or more frequently as evidence of ‘paternalism’ (power and domination of donors over recipients, and their objectification). This paper claims that introducing kinship and parenting studies into researching philanthropy would greatly refine our understanding of donor–recipient relations. In the framework of a qualitative case study of a philanthropic ‘godparenthood’ programme organised in Hungary supporting ethnic Hungarian communities in Romania, this paper looks at the roles, responsibilities and obligations various forms of philanthropic kinship offer for the participants; and relations of power unfolding in helping interactions. With such concerns, this paper complements earlier research on hybridisation of philanthropy, through its sectoral entanglements with kinship and family. Also, it contributes to research on inequalities in philanthropy, by showing how philanthropic kinning may recreate, modify or reshape donor–recipient power relations in diverse ways.
Funder
institute for advanced study, central european university
nkfih grant
Centre for Social Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Business and International Management
Reference67 articles.
1. Aflaki, I., & Freise, M. (2019). Challenging the welfare system and forcing policy innovation? Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in Sweden and Germany. The Journal of Refugee Studies, 34, 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fez036
2. Allen, A. (2005). Feminism and motherhood in Western Europe, 1890–1970: The maternal dilemma. Springer.
3. Appe, S., & Oreg, A. (2020). Lost and found in upstate New York: Exploring the motivations of “lost boys” refugees as founders of international nonprofit organizations. Administration & Society, 52(8), 1209–1238.
4. Bárdi, N. (2013). Different images of the future of the Hungarian communities in neighbouring countries, 1989–2012. European Review, 21, 530–552.
5. Bodó, C., & Lajos, V. (2020). Research on the language revitalization processes of the Moldavian Csángós. Knowledge interpreted with different stakeholders, participation and engagement (in Hungarian). Korunk, 3(9), 42–50.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献