Abstract
AbstractAccurate quantification of quantitative PCR (qPCR) data requires a set of stable reference genes (RGs) for normalisation. Despite its importance to mechanistic studies, no evaluation of RG stability has been conducted for pregnant human myometrium. A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify the most used RGs in human myometrial gene expression studies. The stability of these genes, and others, was then evaluated using geNorm and NormFinder algorithms, in samples of myometrium from singleton or twin pregnancies (n = 7 per group) delivering at term or preterm. The most frequently cited RGs were GAPDH, ACTB, B2M and 18s. There was strong agreement between algorithms on the most and least stable genes: Both indicated CYC1, YWHAZ and ATP5B were the most stably expressed. Despite being some of the most used RGs, B2M, 18s and ACTB expression was least stable and was too variable for use as accurate normalisation factors. Pairwise variation analysis determined that the optimal number of RGs for accurate normalisation is two. Validation of the choice of RGs by comparing relative expression of oxytocin receptors (OXTR) using the least stable 18s and B2M, with the most stable, CYC1 and YWHAZ, erroneously demonstrated significantly increased OXTR expression in myometrium in singleton pregnancies compared to twins. This study demonstrates the importance of appropriate RG selection for accurate quantification of relative expression in pregnant human myometrium qPCR studies. For normalisation, the geometric mean of CYC1 and YWHAZ or ATP5B is suggested. The use of ACTB, 18s and B2M, is not recommended.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics,Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference38 articles.
1. VanGuilder HD, Vrana KE, Freeman WM (2008) Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. Biotechniques 44(5):619–626. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112776
2. Pabinger S, Rödiger S, Kriegner A, Vierlinger K, Weinhäusel A (2014) A survey of tools for the analysis of quantitative PCR (qPCR) data. Biomol Detect Quantif 1(1):23–33
3. Thellin O, ElMoualij B, Heinen E, Zorzi W (2009) A decade of improvements in quantification of gene expression and internal standard selection. Biotechnol Adv 27(4):323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.01.010
4. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3(7):RESEARCH0034
5. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55(4):611–622. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献