Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Octopus vulgaris species complex consists of numerous morphologically similar but genetically distinct species. The current publicly available mitogenome of this species has been generated from a specimen collected from Tsukiji Fish Market, Tokyo, Japan. Octopus from the northwestern Pacific Ocean are now considered to be a separate species, Octopus sinensis. For this reason, we hypothesised that the current record of O. vulgaris was sequenced from a specimen of O. sinensis. Here, we sequenced the first complete mitogenome of a specimen of Octopus vulgaris sensu stricto that was collected from the species’ confirmed distribution areas in northeastern Atlantic.
Methods and results
The complete mitogenome was assembled de novo and annotated using 250 bp paired-end sequences. A single circular contig 15,655 bp in length with a mean read coverage of 1089 reads was reconstructed. The annotation pipeline identified 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNAs (tRNA) and two ribosomal RNAs. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree recovered the assembled mitogenome as the sister taxon of a monophyletic group comprising O. sinensis and the previously published mitogenome of “O. vulgaris” from Japan. This confirms that the latter was a Japanese specimen of O. sinensis.
Conclusion
The mitogenome sequenced here is the first to be published for Octopus vulgaris sensu stricto. It represents an important first step in genetics-informed research on the evolution, conservation, and management of this commercially important species.
Funder
University of Johannesburg
University of Cape Town
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics,Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. Norman MD, Finn JK, Hochberg FG (2013) Family Octopodidae. In: Jereb P, Roper CFE, Norman MD, Finn JK (eds) Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of cephalopod species known to date. Volume 3. Octopods and Vampire Squids. FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. No. 4, Vol. 3. FAO, Rome, pp 36–215
2. Söller R, Warnke K, Saint-Paul U, Blohm D (2000) Sequence divergence of mitochondrial DNA indicates cryptic biodiversity in Octopus vulgaris and supports the taxonomic distinctiveness of Octopus mimus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae). Mar Biol 136:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270050004
3. Leite TS, Haimovici M, Molina W, Warnke K (2008) Morphological and genetic description of Octopus insularis, a new cryptic species in the Octopus vulgaris complex (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) from the tropical Southwestern Atlantic. J Molluscan Stud 74:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eym050
4. Avendaño O, Roura Á, Cedillo-Robles CE, González ÁF, Rodríguez-Canul R, Velázquez-Abunader I, Guerra Á (2020) Octopus americanus: a cryptic species of the O. vulgaris species complex redescribed from the Caribbean. Aquat Ecol 4:909–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09778-6
5. Amor MD, Hart AM (2021) Octopus djinda (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae): a new member of the Octopus vulgaris group from southwest Australia. Zootaxa 5061:145–156. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.1.7