Abstract
Abstract
We developed a ground-motion simulation code base on extended rupture modeling combined with the use of empirical Green’s functions (EGFs), adapted for low-to-moderate seismicity regions (with a limited set of EGFs), and extended its range of applicability to the lowest source-to-site distances. This code is based on a kinematic source description of an extended fault and is designed to allow complex fault geometries and to generate a ground motion variability in agreement with that of the recorded databases. The code is developed to work with a sparse set of EGFs. Each available EGF is therefore used in several positions on the rupture area. To be used in positions different of their original position, we applied to the EGFs some adjustments. In addition to the classical adjustments (i.e. time delay correction, geometrical spreading correction and anelastic attenuation correction), we propose here a radiation pattern adjustment. The effectiveness of it is tested in a numerical application. We showed noticeable improvements at the lowest distances, and some limitations when approaching the nodal planes of the subevents the recording of which were used as EGFs. We took advantage of the development of this code, its ability to work with a sparse set of EGFs, its ability to take into account complex fault geometries and its ability to master the general variability, to perform a ground-motion simulation scenario on the Middle Durance Fault (MDF). We perform simulations for a hard rock site (VS30 = 1800 m/s) and a sediment site (VS30 = 440 m/s) of the CEA Nuclear Research Site of Cadarache (France), and compared the computed ground motion with several ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). The GMPEs slightly underestimate the sediment site but strongly overestimate the ground motion amplitude on the hard rock site, even when using a specific correction factor which adapts GMPEs predictions from rock site to hard rock site. This general ascertainment confirms the need to continue efforts towards the establishment of consistent GMPEs applicable to hard-rock conditions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference66 articles.
1. Abrahamson, N., Silva, W. J., & Kamai, R. (2014). Summary of the ASK14 ground-motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra,30(3), 1025–1055.
2. Aki, K. (1967). Scaling law of seismic spectrum. Journal of Geophysical Research,72(4), 1217–1231.
3. Aki, K., & Richards, P. G. (2002). Quantitative seismology. Sausalito, California: University Science Books. ISBN 0-935702-96-2.
4. Akkar, S., Sandikkaya, M. A., & Bommer, J. J. (2014). Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,12(1), 359–387.
5. Allmann, B. P., & Shearer, P. M. (2009). Global variations of stress drop for moderate-to-large earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,114(B1), 1.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献