Abstract
Abstract
Energy crops are a new player in the traditional agricultural landscape. The present paper analyses the land uses surrounding and the spatial characteristics of the main energy crops in Sweden (willow, poplar, hybrid aspen and reed canary grass) compared to traditional agricultural crops during the period 2006–2018. Spatial metrics (number of shape characterising points, shape index and rectangularity ratio) are calculated for each field, as well as the nearby land uses at varying distances, at radius: 500 m, 1000 m, 2000 m and 5000 m. A total of 1560 energy crop fields are studied in the 2006 dataset and 3416 fields in the 2018 dataset, which are compared to 58,246 fields with cereal crops in 2006 and 131,354 fields in the 2018 dataset. Results show that, despite being established on previous agricultural land, energy crops present a different spatial profile compared to traditional agricultural crops. Field shapes present less complexity than before, and the overall spatial features become more regular with time in both cases of energy crops and cereals, suggesting an increasing trend in cost-efficient agricultural practices and planning. Important differences concerning land use diversity at different scales are found between plantations versus grasses. In general, willow plantations are located in agriculture-dominated areas (> 70% at 500 m, > 50% at 2000 m), whereas reed canary grass is in forest-dominated landscapes (> 30% at 500 m, > 60% at 2000 m); both contribute to diversifying existing land uses although with varying effects. The results of this study are a basis to assess the impacts of energy crops at landscape level and can translate into applications in energy policy and planning.
Funder
Fortum Foundation
China Scholarship Council
Academy of Finland Flagship UNITE
SNS research project SYNERGIES
University of Eastern Finland (UEF) including Kuopio University Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Agronomy and Crop Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference58 articles.
1. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland (MMM). https://mmm.fi/en/food-and-agriculture/policy/agricultural-policy#:~:text=The%20EU's%20Common%20Agricultural%20Policy,policy%20was%20launched%20in%201962. Accessed 8 May 2022
2. Van Zanten BT, Verburg PH, Espinosa M, Gomez-y-Paloma S, Galimberti G, Kantelhardt J, Kapfer M, Lefebvre M, Manrique R, Piorr A, Raggi M (2014) European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34(2):309–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4
3. Fry G, Sarlöv-Herlin I (1997) The ecological and amenity functions of woodland edges in the agricultural landscape; a basis for design and management. Landsc Urban Plan 37(1–2):45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00369-6
4. Gabrielle B, Bamière L, Caldes N, De Cara S, Decocq G, Ferchaud F, Loyce C, Pelzer E, Perez Y, Wohlfahrt J, Richard G (2014) Paving the way for sustainable bioenergy in Europe: technological options and research avenues for large-scale biomass feedstock supply. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 33:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.050
5. Svebio (2020) Swedish Bioenergy Association. Roadmap Bioenergy – meeting the demand for bioenergy in a fossil free Sweden. https://www.svebio.se/app/uploads/2020/03/Roadmap-Bioenergy-2020.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2021
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献