Evaluating Free Rides and Observational Advantages in Set Visualizations
-
Published:2021-04-15
Issue:3
Volume:30
Page:557-600
-
ISSN:0925-8531
-
Container-title:Journal of Logic, Language and Information
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J of Log Lang and Inf
Author:
Blake Andrew, Stapleton GemORCID, Rodgers Peter, Touloumis Anestis
Abstract
AbstractFree rides and observational advantages occur in visualizations when they reveal facts that must be inferred from an alternative representation. Understanding whether these concepts correspond to cognitive advantages is important: do they facilitate information extraction, saving the ‘deductive cost’ of making inferences? This paper presents the first evaluations of free rides and observational advantages in visualizations of sets compared to text. We found that, for Euler and linear diagrams, free rides and observational advantages yielded significant improvements in task performance. For Venn diagrams, whilst their observational advantages yielded significant performance benefits over text, this was not universally true for free rides. The consequences are two-fold: more research is needed to establish when free rides are beneficial, and the results suggest that observational advantages better explain the cognitive advantages of diagrams over text. A take-away message is that visualizations with observational advantages are likely to be cognitively advantageous over competing representations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference25 articles.
1. Alper, B., Henry Riche, N., Ramos, G., & Czerwinski, M. (2011). Design study of LineSets, a novel set visualization technique. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2259–2267. 2. Alsallakh, B., Micallef, L., Aigner, W., Hauser, H., Miksch, S., & Rodgers, P. (2014). Visualizing sets and set-typed data: State-of-the-art and future challenges. In Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis) (pp. 124–138). 3. Blake, A., Stapleton, G., Rodgers, P., Cheek, L., & Howse, J. (2014). The impact of shape on the perception of Euler diagrams. In 8th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams (pp. 124–138). Springer. 4. Blake, A., Stapleton, G., Rodgers, P., & Howse, J. (2016). The impact of topological and graphical choices on the perception of Euler diagrams. Information Sciences, 330, 455–482. 5. Chapman, P., Stapleton, G., Rodgers, P., Michallef, L., & Blake, A. (2014). Visualizing sets: An empirical comparison of diagram types. In Diagrams 2014 (pp. 146–160). Springer.
|
|