The Effort of Reasoning: Modelling the Inference Steps of Boundedly Rational Agents

Author:

Solaki AnthiaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper we design a new logical system to explicitly model the different deductive reasoning steps of a boundedly rational agent. We present an adequate system in line with experimental findings about an agent’s reasoning limitations and the cognitive effort that is involved. Inspired by Dynamic Epistemic Logic, we work with dynamic operators denoting explicit applications of inference rules in our logical language. Our models are supplemented by (a) impossible worlds (not closed under logical consequence), suitably structured according to the effect of inference rules, and (b) quantitative components capturing the agent’s cognitive capacity and the cognitive costs of rules with respect to certain resources (e.g. memory, time). These ingredients allow us to avoid problematic logical closure principles, while at the same time deductive reasoning is reflected in our dynamic truth clauses. We further show that our models can be reduced to awareness-like plausibility structures that validate the same formulas and we give a sound and complete axiomatization with respect to them. This approach to the agent’s internal deductive reasoning is finally combined with actions of external information.

Funder

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference47 articles.

1. Alechina, N., & Logan, B. (2009). A logic of situated resource-bounded agents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 18, 79–95.

2. Baltag, A., Moss, L. S., & Solecki, S. (1998). The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In Proceedings of the 7th conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge, TARK’98 (pp. 43–56). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

3. Baltag, A., & Renne, B. (2016). Dynamic epistemic logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2016 edn.

4. Baltag, A., & Smets, S. (2008). A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision. Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory, Texts in Logic and Games, 3, 9–58.

5. Baltag, A., & Smets, S. (2009). Group belief dynamics under iterated revision: fixed points and cycles of joint upgrades. In TARK.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Predictive Theory of Mind Models Based on Public Announcement Logic;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2024

2. Realizing impossibilities;Synthese;2023-12-21

3. AN ALGORITHMIC IMPOSSIBLE-WORLDS MODEL OF BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE;The Review of Symbolic Logic;2023-03-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3