Cognitive Structuralism: Explaining the Regularity of the Natural Numbers Progression

Author:

Quinon PaulaORCID

Abstract

AbstractAccording to one of the most powerful paradigms explaining the meaning of the concept of natural number, natural numbers get a large part of their conceptual content from core cognitive abilities. Carey’s bootstrapping provides a model of the role of core cognition in the creation of mature mathematical concepts. In this paper, I conduct conceptual analyses of various theories within this paradigm, concluding that the theories based on the ability to subitize (i.e., to assess an exact quantity of the elements in a collection without counting them), or on the ability to approximate quantities (i.e., to assess an approximate quantity of the elements in a collection without counting them), or both, fail to provide a conceptual basis for bootstrapping the concept of an exact natural number. In particular, I argue that none of the existing theories explains one of the key characteristics of the natural number structure: the equidistances between successive elements of the natural numbers progression. I suggest that this regularity could be based on another innate cognitive ability, namely sensitivity to the regularity of rhythm. In the final section, I propose a new position within the core cognition paradigm, inspired by structuralist positions in philosophy of mathematics.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference84 articles.

1. Beck, J. 2017. Can bootstrapping explain concept learning? Cognition 158: 110–121.

2. Benacerraf, P. 1965. What numbers could not be. The Philosophical Review 74(1): 47–73.

3. Benacerraf, P. 1996. Recantation or any old ω-sequence would do after all. Philosophia Mathematica 3(1): 184–189.

4. Benis-Sinaceur, H. 2014. Neuropsychology of numbers Lecture at the Mathematics: Objectivity by representation, ANR-DFG-Workshop MCMP (Watch the Lecture @ LMUcast).

5. Blanchette, P. 2018. The Frege-Hilbert controversy. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/frege-hilbert/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3