The Art Experience

Author:

McCallum Kate,Mitchell Scott,Scott-Phillips ThomORCID

Abstract

Abstract Art theory has consistently emphasised the importance of situational, cultural, institutional and historical factors in viewers’ experience of fine art. However, the link between this heavily context-dependent interpretation and the workings of the mind is often left unexamined. Drawing on relevance theory—a prominent, cogent and productive body of work in cognitive pragmatics—we here argue that fine art achieves its effects by prompting the use of cognitive processes that are more commonly employed in the interpretation of words and other stimuli presented in a communicative context. We describe in particular how institutional factors effectively co-opt these processes for new ends, allowing viewers to achieve cognitive effects that they otherwise would not, and so provide cognitivist backing for an Institutional Theory of Art, such as that put forward by Arthur Danto (1964). More generally, we situate and describe the Western fine art tradition as a phenomenon that is a consequence of both the cognitive processes involved in communication, and of cultural norms, practices and institutions.

Funder

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference60 articles.

1. Adorno, T. W. (1997). Aesthetic Theory. A&C Black. (Original work published 1970).

2. Barthes, R. (1978). Death of the author. In Image-music-text (pp. 143–148). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

3. Beardsley, M. (1976). Is art essentially institutional? In: Culture and art (pp. 194–209). Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

4. Brabanter, P.D. 2010. Uttering sentences made up of words and gestures. In Explicit communication, 199–216. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292352_13 .

5. Buekens, F., and J. Smit. 2018. Institutions and the Artworld – A critical note. Journal of Social Ontology 4: 53–66.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3