Abstract
Abstract
Art theory has consistently emphasised the importance of situational, cultural, institutional and historical factors in viewers’ experience of fine art. However, the link between this heavily context-dependent interpretation and the workings of the mind is often left unexamined. Drawing on relevance theory—a prominent, cogent and productive body of work in cognitive pragmatics—we here argue that fine art achieves its effects by prompting the use of cognitive processes that are more commonly employed in the interpretation of words and other stimuli presented in a communicative context. We describe in particular how institutional factors effectively co-opt these processes for new ends, allowing viewers to achieve cognitive effects that they otherwise would not, and so provide cognitivist backing for an Institutional Theory of Art, such as that put forward by Arthur Danto (1964). More generally, we situate and describe the Western fine art tradition as a phenomenon that is a consequence of both the cognitive processes involved in communication, and of cultural norms, practices and institutions.
Funder
FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference60 articles.
1. Adorno, T. W. (1997). Aesthetic Theory. A&C Black. (Original work published 1970).
2. Barthes, R. (1978). Death of the author. In Image-music-text (pp. 143–148). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
3. Beardsley, M. (1976). Is art essentially institutional? In: Culture and art (pp. 194–209). Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
4. Brabanter, P.D. 2010. Uttering sentences made up of words and gestures. In Explicit communication, 199–216. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292352_13
.
5. Buekens, F., and J. Smit. 2018. Institutions and the Artworld – A critical note. Journal of Social Ontology 4: 53–66.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献