Abstract
AbstractTwo different types of subjective well-being (SWB) measures exhibit a remarkable difference in their correlations with people’s circumstances. The life satisfaction method shows relatively a strong correlation with income and material conveniences while affective measures are more tightly linked with freedom. Why is this so? To explain this difference I examine the cognitive mechanisms underlying these measures by means of dual process theory. This theory identifies two broad categories of cognition. One is Type 1: fast, intuitive, automatic and autonomous. The other is Type 2: slow, deliberate and under conscious control. (They are also known as System 1 and System 2). I argue that in our normal decision making there is a division of labor between these mechanisms. Type 2 is more focused on making choices, comparing material goods and tradeoffs between them, while Type 1 is more oriented at the freedom that is necessary to make those choices.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference40 articles.
1. Alexandrova, A. 2008. First-person reports and the measurement of happiness. Philosophical Psychology 21(5): 571–583.
2. Alexandrova, A. 2017. A philosophy for the Science of Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Barrett, L. 2017. How emotions are made: the secret life of the brain. San Francisco: Harcourt.
4. Boyd, R. 1999. Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In Species: New Interdisciplinary essays, ed. R. Wilson. Cambridge (Mssch.): MIT Press.
5. Brown, G., and J. Gathergood. 2020. Consumption changes, not income changes, predict changes in subjective well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science 11: 64–73.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献