Challenges of a GIS-based physical-geographical regionalization of Poland

Author:

Piniarski WitoldORCID

Abstract

AbstractPoland’s traditional, i.e., non-GIS, regionalization needed to be updated for landscape audit purposes. Its spatial accuracy appeared insufficient, which led to the verification and adjustment of the existing physical-geographical mesoregions using GIS and high-resolution spatial data. In Poland, provincial landscape audits are part of implementing the European Landscape Convention to Polish law order, which led to the renewal of interest in the natural spatial division of the country. To date, there is no unified division of the entire country into microregions, which in Poland are commonly perceived as the most appropriate natural spatial units for local-scale landscape analysis and management. Microregions are lower-rank spatial units than already existing mesoregions. Both are distinguished by a homogenous landscape defined within the specific area by common physical-geographical characteristics of the land. Nevertheless, each is recognized at different scales and levels of generality. This paper focuses on reviewing the current challenges of the physical-geographical regionalization of Poland. Their fundamentals were identified through a systematic literature review. It also presents all the problems encountered within implementing GIS in the microregionalization procedure, which was already used for the Greater Poland Voivodeship landscape audit. In general, all traditional methodologies related to the physical-geographical regionalization of Poland require the introduction of GIS solutions to meet the current expectations from the country’s contemporary natural spatial division. The landscape contrast analysis method proved to be a promising method of GIS-based regionalization. It has the potential to become a universal solution to the existing problems with a unified physical-geographical microregionalization of Poland. However, some hard-to-overcome obstacles are related to the availability, collection, and processing of all required thematic spatial data. Nonetheless, it is highly expected to develop a universal procedure of microregionalization and distinguish low-rank units for the entire country.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine

Reference102 articles.

1. Act of 24 April 2015, amending certain acts in relation to strengthening tools of landscape protection instruments. (2015). Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland, item 774.

2. Balon, J., & Krąż, P. (2013). Ocena jakości krajobrazu – dobór prawidłowych jednostek krajobrazowych. In Identyfikacja i waloryzacja krajobrazów – wdrażanie Europejskiej Konwencji Krajobrazowe. Referaty konferencyjne (pp. 58-63). Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa.

3. Bański, J. (2010). Border in geographical research studies – Definition and an attempts at its classification. Przegląd Geograficzny, 82(4), 289–508.

4. Breunig, M., Bradley, P. E., Jahn, M., Kuper, P., Mazroob, N., Rösch, N., Al-Doori, M., Stefanakis, E., & Jadidi, M. (2020). Geospatial data management research: Progress and future directions. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020095

5. Buckley, D. J., Canada. Forestry Canada, Reid, Collins and Associates. (1990). The GIS Primer: An Introduction to Geographical Information Systems. Forestry Canada.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3