A novel method for identifying coded tags recorded on aquatic acoustic monitoring systems
-
Published:2022-09-20
Issue:11
Volume:194
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-6369
-
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess
Author:
Lowe Christopher D.ORCID, Tregenza Nicolas J. C.ORCID, Allen Claudia J., Blow Georgina E., Nuuttila HannaORCID, Bertelli Chiara M.ORCID, Mendzil Anouska F.ORCID, Stamp Thomas, Sheehan Emma V.ORCID, Davies PeterORCID, Gordon Jonathan C. D.ORCID, Bolland Jonathan D., Britton J. RobertORCID, Main Robert, Velterop Randolph, Crundwell Charles, Schofield Andrew, Clarke David R. K.
Abstract
AbstractAquatic biotelemetry increasingly relies on using acoustic transmitters (‘tags’) that enable passive detection of tagged animals using fixed or mobile receivers. Both tracking methods are resource-limited, restricting the spatial area in which movements of highly mobile animals can be measured using proprietary detection systems. Transmissions from tags are recorded by underwater noise monitoring systems designed for other purposes, such as cetacean monitoring devices, which have been widely deployed in the marine environment; however, no tools currently exist to decode these detections, and thus valuable additional information on animal movements may be missed. Here, we describe simple hybrid methods, with potentially wide application, for obtaining information from otherwise unused data sources. The methods were developed using data from moored, acoustic cetacean detectors (C-PODs) and towed passive receiver arrays, often deployed to monitor the vocalisations of cetaceans, but any similarly formatted data source could be used. The method was applied to decode tag detections that were found to have come from two highly mobile fish species, bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and Twaite shad (Alosa fallax), that had been tagged in other studies. Decoding results were validated using test tags; range testing data were used to demonstrate the relative efficiency of these receiver methods in detecting tags. This approach broadens the range of equipment from which acoustic tag detections can be decoded. Novel detections derived from the method could add significant value to past and present tracking studies at little additional cost, by providing new insights into the movement of mobile animals at sea.
Funder
European Regional Development Fund Devon and Severn Inshore Fisheries Conservation Authority European Maritime and Fisheries Fund Unlocking the Severn EU LIFE nature programme National Lottery Community Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine
Reference42 articles.
1. Abecasis, D., Steckenreuter, A., Reubens, J., Aarestrup, K., Alós, J., Badalamenti, F., & Afonso, P. (2018). A review of acoustic telemetry in Europe and the need for a regional aquatic telemetry network. Animal Biotelemetry, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-018-0156-0 2. Ammann, A. J. (2020). Factors affecting detection probability and range of transmitters and receivers designed for the Juvenile Salmon Acoustic Telemetry System. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 103(5), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-020-00987-4 3. Au, W. W. L., & Lammers, M. O. (2016). Listening to echolocation clicks with PODs. In Listening in the Ocean (pp 1–19). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3176-7 4. Bolland, J. D., Nunn, A. D., Angelopoulos, N. V., Dodd, J. R., Davies, P., Gutmann Roberts, C., & Cowx, I. G. (2019). Refinement of acoustic-tagging protocol for twaite shad Alosa fallax (Lacépède), a species sensitive to handling and sedation. Fisheries Research, 212(July 2018), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.12.006 5. Brownscombe, J. W., Griffin, L. P., Chapman, J. M., Morley, D., Acosta, A., Crossin, G. T., & Danylchuk, A. J. (2020). A practical method to account for variation in detection range in acoustic telemetry arrays to accurately quantify the spatial ecology of aquatic animals. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13322
|
|