Characterizing heterogeneous forest structure in ponderosa pine forests via UAS-derived structure from motion

Author:

Hanna Laura,Tinkham Wade T.,Battaglia Mike A.,Vogeler Jody C.,Ritter Scott M.,Hoffman Chad M.

Abstract

AbstractIncreasingly, dry conifer forest restoration has focused on reestablishing horizontal and vertical complexity and ecological functions associated with frequent, low-intensity fires that characterize these systems. However, most forest inventory approaches lack the resolution, extent, or spatial explicitness for describing tree-level spatial aggregation and openings that were characteristic of historical forests. Uncrewed aerial system (UAS) structure from motion (SfM) remote sensing has potential for creating spatially explicit forest inventory data. This study evaluates the accuracy of SfM-estimated tree, clump, and stand structural attributes across 11 ponderosa pine-dominated stands treated with four different silvicultural prescriptions. Specifically, UAS-estimated tree height and diameter-at-breast-height (DBH) and stand-level canopy cover, density, and metrics of individual trees, tree clumps, and canopy openings were compared to forest survey data. Overall, tree detection success was high in all stands (F-scores of 0.64 to 0.89), with average F-scores > 0.81 for all size classes except understory trees (< 5.0 m tall). We observed average height and DBH errors of 0.34 m and − 0.04 cm, respectively. The UAS stand density was overestimated by 53 trees ha−1 (27.9%) on average, with most errors associated with understory trees. Focusing on trees > 5.0 m tall, reduced error to an underestimation of 10 trees ha−1 (5.7%). Mean absolute errors of bole basal area, bole quadratic mean diameter, and canopy cover were 11.4%, 16.6%, and 13.8%, respectively. While no differences were found between stem-mapped and UAS-derived metrics of individual trees, clumps of trees, canopy openings, and inter-clump tree characteristics, the UAS method overestimated crown area in two of the five comparisons. Results indicate that in ponderosa pine forests, UAS can reliably describe large- and small-grained forest structures to effectively inform spatially explicit management objectives.

Funder

Rocky Mountain Research Station

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference65 articles.

1. Addington, R. N., Aplet, G. H., Battaglia, M. A., Briggs, J. S., Brown, P. M., Cheng, A. S., Dickinson, Y. A., Feinstein, J. A., Pelz, K. A., Regan, C. M., Thinnes, J. W., Truex, R. L., Fornwalt, P. J., Gannon, B., Julian, C. W., Underhill, J. L., & Wolk, B. (2018). Principles and practices for the restoration of ponderosa pine and dry mixed-conifer forests of the Colorado Front Range. (121 p.). General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-37. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-373

2. Ahmed, O. S., Franklin, S. E., Wulder, M. A., & White, J. C. (2015). Characterizing stand-level forest canopy cover and height using Landsat time series, samples of airborne lidar, and the random forest algorithm. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 101, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.11.007

3. Allen, C. D., Savage, M., Falk, D. A., Suckling, K. F., Swetnam, T. W., Schulke, T., Stacey, P. B., Morgan, P., Hoffman, M., & Klingel, J. T. (2002). Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: A broad perspective. Ecological Applications, 12(5), 1418–1433. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1418:erospp]2.0.co;2

4. Almeida, D. R. A., Broadbent, E. N., Zambrano, A. M. A., Wilkinson, B. E., Ferreira, M. E., Chazdon, R., Meli, P., Gorgens, E. B., Silva, C. A., Stark, S. C., & Valbuena, R. (2019). Monitoring the structure of forest restoration plantations with a drone-lidar system. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 79, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.03.014

5. Belmonte, A., Sankey, T., Biederman, J. A., Bradford, J., Goetz, S. J., Kolb, T., & Woolley, T. (2020). UAV-derived estimates of forest structure to inform ponderosa pine forest restoration. Remote Sensing, 6(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.137

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3