Sustainable indigenous bio-mixture for restoration the soil point source pollution with special reference to chlorpyrifos
-
Published:2024-03-13
Issue:4
Volume:196
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-6369
-
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess
Author:
Mansee Ayman H.,Ebrahim Amal M.,Koreish Essam A.
Abstract
AbstractImproper pesticide handling is the main cause of contamination of the environment in agricultural systems. This could be caused by leakage of spraying liquid, leftovers, and inappropriate washing of spraying equipment. This study assessed the ability of suggested biomixture modules for remediate repetitive cycles of high chlorpyrifos doses. In three consecutive treatments, four tested modules were contaminated with 160 µg g−1 chlorpyrifos. Chlorpyrifos residues, dehydrogenase activity, and microbial respiration were continuously monitored for 22 weeks. Six bacterial consortia were isolated at the end of the experiment from four treated modules (B+3, BF+3, S+3, and SF+3) and two from untreated modules (B and S). The isolated consortium efficiency in degrading chlorpyrifos was studied. The results revealed that the best chlorpyrifos removal efficiency was achieved when using the stimulated biomixture module (BF) recorded 98%, 100%, and 89%, at the end of three chlorpyrifos treatments, respectively. Such removal efficiency was compatible with the biological activity results of the tested modules: dehydrogenase activity and microbial respiration. There was no difference in the efficiency among the S, B, and BF+3 consortia. The results presented here demonstrate that the combination of vermicompost, wheat straw, soil, and NPK (stimulated biomixture module) can successfully reduce the risk of a point source of pesticide pollution.
Funder
Alexandria University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Abdelgawad, D. M., Marei, A. S., & Mansee, A. H. (2022). Managing the efficiencies of three different bacterial isolates for removing atrazine from wastewater. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part b: Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 57(12), 959–948. 2. Adak, T., Mahapatra, B., Swain, H., Patil, N. B., Pandi, G. P., Gowda, G. B., Annamalai, M., Pokhare, S. S., Meena, S., Rath, P. C., & Jena, M. (2020). Indigenous biobed to limit point source pollution of imidacloprid in tropical countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 272, 111084. 3. Adesodun, J. K., Mbagu, J. S., & Oti, W. (2005). Residual effect of poultry manure and NPK fertilizer residues on soil nutrient and performance of jute (Cochorus oliorus L.). Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 15(1), 153–133. 4. Angelakis, A. N., Asano, T., Bahri, A., Jimenez, B., & Tchobanoglous, G. (2018). Water reuse: From ancient to modern times and the future front. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 6, 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00026 5. Casida, L. E., Klein, D. A., & Santoro, T. (1964). Soil Dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science, 98, 376–371.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|