Exploring PAH kinetics in wild vs. transplanted triploid and diploid oysters at a contaminated field site using immunological techniques
-
Published:2023-11-13
Issue:12
Volume:195
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-6369
-
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess
Author:
Prossner Kristen M.,Harvey Ellen,Unger Michael A.
Abstract
AbstractCrassostrea virginica is a well-established bivalve species for biomonitoring persistent organic pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in aquatic environments. Differing biomonitoring methods employing either wild oysters inhabiting sites of interest or naïve cultured oysters deployed to sites for extended periods can be used for site evaluations. However, important differences in total contaminant concentrations accumulated have been observed between the wild and transplanted groups. Furthermore, although rearing cultured triploid oysters is widely popular in commercial farming, the difference in contaminant bioaccumulation potential between triploid and diploid cultured oysters is vastly understudied, particularly for organic contaminants such as PAH. This study explores differences in PAH kinetics between transplanted triploid and diploid cultured oysters and wild oysters at a PAH-impacted site during a 6-week field exposure study using novel immunological techniques: antibody-based biosensor technology and immunofluorescence visualization. Conventional chemical analysis of oyster tissue was also conducted for comparison. While differences were observed in the oyster interstitial fluid between the wild and transplanted oysters throughout the study, whole tissue analysis revealed differing trends at each time point. Our findings suggest that insufficient equilibration time may contribute to the differences observed between groups. Furthermore, when combined with visual evidence via immunofluorescence, internal partitioning of contaminants may be an important determinant for total concentrations measured. A better understanding of the differences observed between wild and transplanted oyster groups is necessary for improved biomonitoring. Our study highlights the value in employing novel immunological techniques to explore possible mechanisms driving these differences.
Funder
Elizabeth River Monitoring Initiative, VIMS
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine
Reference48 articles.
1. Allen, S. K., Jr., & Downing, S. L. (1986). Performance of triploid Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg). I. Survival, growth, glycogen content, and sexual maturation in yearlings. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 102, 197–208. 2. Allen, S. K., Downing, S. L., & Chew, K. K. (1989). Hatchery manual for producing triploid oysters. Washington Sea Grant Program. 3. Barber, B. J., & Mann, R. L. (1991). Sterile triploid Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791) grow faster than diploids but are equally susceptible to Perkinsus marinus. Journal of Shellfish Research, 10, 445. 4. Besse, J. P., Geffard, O., & Coquery, M. (2012). Relevance and applicability of active biomonitoring in continental waters under the Water Framework Directive. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 36, 113–127. 5. Beyer, J., Green, N. W., Brooks, S., Allan, I. J., Ruus, A., Gomes, T., Bråte, I. L. N., & Schøyen, M. (2017). Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution monitoring: A review. Marine Environmental Research, 130, 338–365.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|