Dissolved polycyclic aromatic compounds in Canada’s Athabasca River in relation to Oil Sands from 2013 through 2019-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Dissolved polycyclic aromatic compounds in Canada’s Athabasca River in relation to Oil Sands from 2013 through 2019

Published:2023-10-21 Issue:11 Volume:195 Page:
ISSN:0167-6369
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
language:en
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess

Author:

Lévesque Lucie M. J.,Roy Julie,Glozier Nancy E.,Dirk Leah,Cooke Colin A.

Abstract

AbstractThe Canada-Alberta Oil Sands Monitoring (OSM) Program began long-term surface water quality monitoring on the lower Athabasca River in 2012. Sampling of low level, bio-accumulative polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) targeted a suite of parent and alkylated compounds in the Athabasca River (AR) mainstem using semi-permeable membrane devices (SPMDs). Samples were collected along a gradient from upstream reference near Athabasca, Alberta, through exposure to the Athabasca oil sands deposit (AOSD), various tributary inflows, and mining activities within the OSMA, to downstream recovery near Wood Buffalo National Park (WBNP) and reference on the Slave River. The program adapted over the years, shifting in response to program review and environmental events. The AOSD chemical fingerprint was present in samples collected within the AOSD, through the oil sands mineable area (OSMA), downstream to recovery from 2013 to 2019. PACs were dominated by alkylated phenanthrenes/anthracenes (PAs) and dibenzothiophenes (Ds), with elevated levels of alkylated fluorenes (Fs), naphthalenes (Ns), fluoranthenes/pyrenes (FlPys) and benzo[a]anthracenes/chrysenes (BaACs), increasing in concentration from C1 < C2 < C3 < C4. Concentrations of these petrogenic PACs were at their highest within the OSMA and downstream of tributaries. The AOSD fingerprint was absent from sites located outside of the influence of the AOSD and downstream of the Peace-Athabasca Delta on the Slave River. PAC concentrations in the AR increased with mainstem discharge and loadings from tributaries, were moderated by the PAD, and diluted by the Peace River. This work bolsters the baseline PAC information previously reported for the Athabasca River and waters downstream, reporting 7 years of data, from all sites within the mainstem monitoring program, and exploring potential regional and hydrological drivers of these between sites and over time.

Funder

Environment & Climate Change Canada

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-023-11846-x.pdf

Reference36 articles.

1. Alvarez, D. A. (2010). Guidelines for the use of the semipermeable membrane device (SPMD) and the polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) in environmental monitoring studies: U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques and Methods, 1-D4, 28.

2. Andersson, J. T., & Achten, C. (2015). Time to say goodbye to the 16EPA PAHs? Toward an up-to-date use of PACs for environmental purposes. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds, 35(2–4), 330–354.

3. AXYS Analytical Services Ltd. (2013). Summary of AXYS method MLA-021 rev. 10 Ver. 08: Analytical method for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), alkylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and alkanes, (p. 26). AXYS Analytical Services Ltd, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada.

4. AXYS Analytical Services Ltd. (2014). Appendix 5: AXYS standard operating procedure SLA-118 rev.06 summary: Extraction (Dialysis) of semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs). In Project 349 Delivery #1 Final Report – Analysis of Semipermeable Membrane Devices (SPMD) for PAH and Alkylated PAH. Report prepared for Environment Canada (p. 65).

5. Boehm, P., & Saba, T. (2008). Identification and allocation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Environmental Forensics Notes, 4, 1–5.