No lukewarm diatom communities—the response of freshwater benthic diatoms to phosphorus in streams as basis for a new phosphorus diatom index (PDISE)
-
Published:2023-06-06
Issue:7
Volume:195
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-6369
-
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess
Author:
Kahlert Maria,Fölster Jens,Tapolczai Kálmán
Abstract
Abstract
In the present study, we developed a new Swedish phosphorus diatom index (PDISE) to improve the poor fit of existing indices to match the needs of water managers to detect and mitigate eutrophication. We took advantage of a large amount of data (820 Swedish stream sites) collected in recent years. During our work, we found an unexpected bimodal response of the diatom assemblages to phosphorus. The taxa clustered either into an assemblage with a low or with a high site-specific averaged TP optimum (a calculated value comprised of the diatom taxa-specific optima). We could not find a characteristic diatom assemblage for sites with intermediate site-specific averaged TP optima. To our knowledge, this bimodal community response has not been shown earlier. The PDISE correlated more strongly than the currently used TDI to changes in TP concentrations. Thus, the PDISE should replace the TDI in the Swedish standard method. The modeled TP optima (expressed as categories) were different compared to the TDI for most of the taxa included in the index, indicating that the realized niche for these morphotaxa was different between Sweden and the UK where the TDI was developed originally. With a r2 of 0.68, the correlation of the PDISE to TP is among the highest reported for other diatom nutrient indices globally; thus, we believe that it might be worth to test it for other bioregions with similar geography and climate.
Funder
Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine
Reference45 articles.
1. Bradshaw, E. G., & Anderson, N. J. (2001). Validation of a diatom–phosphorus calibration set for Sweden. Freshwater Biology, 46(8), 1035–1048. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00732.x 2. Carvalho, L., Mackay, E. B., Cardoso, A. C., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Birk, S., Blackstock, K. L., Borics, G., Borja, A., Feld, C. K., Ferreira, M. T., Globevnik, L., Grizzetti, B., Hendry, S., Hering, D., Kelly, M., Langaas, S., Meissner, K., Panagopoulos, Y., Penning, E., … Solheim, A. L. (2019). Protecting and restoring Europe’s waters: An analysis of the future development needs of the Water Framework Directive. Science of the Total Environment, 658, 1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.255 3. Cemagref (1982). Etude des méthodes biologiques d´appréciation quantitative de la qualité des eaux. Q.E. Lyon-A.F.Bassion Rhône-Méditeranée-Corse, p 218 4. CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2014a). Water quality – Guidance for the routine sampling and preparation of benthic diatoms from rivers and lakes. EN 13946:2014. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Geneva, Switzerland 5. CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2014b). Water quality – Guidance for the identification and enumeration of benthic diatom samples from rivers and lakes. EN 14407:2014. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
|
|