Applications of mathematical modelling for assessing microplastic transport and fate in water environments: a comparative review
-
Published:2024-06-27
Issue:7
Volume:196
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-6369
-
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess
Author:
Moodley Tyrone,Abunama Taher,Kumari Sheena,Amoah Dennis,Seyam Mohammed
Abstract
AbstractMicroplastics in the environment are considered complex pollutants as they are chemical and corrosive-resistant, non-biodegradable and ubiquitous. These microplastics may act as vectors for the dissemination of other pollutants and the transmission of microorganisms into the water environment. The currently available literature reviews focus on analysing the occurrence, environmental effects and methods of microplastic detection, however lacking a wide-scale systematic review and classification of the mathematical microplastic modelling applications. Thus, the current review provides a global overview of the modelling methodologies used for microplastic transport and fate in water environments. This review consolidates, classifies and analyses the methods, model inputs and results of 61 microplastic modelling studies in the last decade (2012–2022). It thoroughly discusses their strengths, weaknesses and common gaps in their modelling framework. Five main modelling types were classified as follows: hydrodynamic, process-based, statistical, mass-balance and machine learning models. Further, categorisations based on the water environments, location and published year of these applications were also adopted. It is concluded that addressed modelling types resulted in relatively reliable outcomes, yet each modelling framework has its strengths and weaknesses. However, common issues were found such as inputs being unrealistically assumed, especially biological processes, and the lack of sufficient field data for model calibration and validation. For future research, it is recommended to incorporate macroplastics’ degradation rates, particles of different shapes and sizes and vertical mixing due to biofouling and turbulent conditions and also more experimental data to obtain precise model inputs and standardised sampling methods for surface and column waters.
Funder
Water Research Commission National Research Foundation of South Africa Durban University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Abunama, T., Othman, F., Ansari, M., & El-Shafie, A. (2019). Leachate generation rate modeling using artificial intelligence algorithms aided by input optimization method for an MSW landfill. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(4), 3368–3381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3749-5 2. Alosairi, Y., Al-Salem, S., & Al Ragum, A. (2020). Three-dimensional numerical modelling of transport, fate and distribution of microplastics in the northwestern Arabian/Persian Gulf. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 161, 111723. 3. Atwood, E. C., Falcieri, F. M., Piehl, S., Bochow, M., Matthies, M., Franke, J., Carniel, S., Sclavo, M., Laforsch, C., & Siegert, F. (2019). Coastal accumulation of microplastic particles emitted from the Po River, Northern Italy: Comparing remote sensing and hydrodynamic modelling with in situ sample collections. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 138, 561–574. 4. Ballent, A., Pando, S., Purser, A., Juliano, M., & Thomsen, L. (2013). Modelled transport of benthic marine microplastic pollution in the Nazaré Canyon. Biogeosciences, 10(12), 7957–7970. 5. Berezina, A., Yakushev, E., Savchuk, O., Vogelsang, C., & Staalstrom, A. (2021). Modelling the influence from biota and organic matter on the transport dynamics of microplastics in the water column and bottom sediments in the oslo fjord. Water, 13(19), 2690.
|
|