Evaluating the attenuation of naphthenic acids in constructed wetland mesocosms planted with Carex aquatilis
-
Published:2023-09-19
Issue:10
Volume:195
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-6369
-
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess
Author:
Trepanier Kaitlyn E.,Vander Meulen Ian J.,Ahad Jason M. E.,Headley John V.,Degenhardt Dani
Abstract
AbstractSurface oil sands mining and extraction in northern Alberta’s Athabasca oil sands region produce large volumes of oil sands process–affected water (OSPW). OSPW is a complex mixture containing major contaminant classes including trace metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and naphthenic acid fraction compounds (NAFCs). Naphthenic acids (NAs) are the primary organic toxicants in OSPW, and reducing their concentrations is a priority for oil sands companies. Previous evidence has shown that constructed wetland treatment systems (CWTSs) are capable of reducing the concentration of NAs and the toxicity of OSPW through bioremediation. In this study, we constructed greenhouse mesocosms with OSPW or lab process water (LPW) (i.e., water designed to mimic OSPW minus the NAFC content) with three treatments: (1) OSPW planted with Carex aquatilis; (2) OSPW, no plants; and (3) LPW, no plants. The OSPW–C. aquatilis treatment saw a significant reduction in NAFC concentrations in comparison to OSPW, no plant treatments, but both changed the distribution of the NAFCs in similar ways. Upon completion of the study, treatments with OSPW saw fewer high-molecular-weight NAs and an increase in the abundance of O3- and O4-containing formulae. Results from this study provide invaluable information on how constructed wetlands can be used in future remediation of OSPW in a way that previous studies were unable to achieve due to uncontrollable environmental factors in field experiments and the active, high-energy processes used in CWTSs pilot studies.
Funder
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Natural Resources Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine
Reference91 articles.
1. Abdalrhman, A. S., & El-din, M. G. (2020). Degradation of organics in real oil sandss process water by electro-oxidation using graphite and dimensionally stable anodes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 38, 124406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124406 2. AER (Alberta Energy Reguator). (2017). Directive 085. November 1–13. 3. Ahad, J. M. E., Pakdel, H., Gammon, P. R., Mayer, B., Savard, M. M., Peru, K. M., & Headley, J. V. (2020). Distinguishing natural from anthropogenic sources of acid extractable organics in groundwater near oil sandss tailings ponds. Environmental Science and Technology, 54(5), 2790–2799. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06875 4. Ahad, J. M. E., Pakdel, H., Savard, M. M., Calderhead, A. I., Gammon, P. R., Rivera, A., Peru, K. M., & Headley, J. V. (2013). Characterization and quantification of mining-related “naphthenic acids” in groundwater near a major oil sandss tailings pond. Environmental Science and Technology, 47(10), 5023–5030. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3051313 5. Ahad, J. M. E., Pakdel, H., Savard, M. M., Simard, M. C., & Smirnoff, A. (2012). Extraction, separation, and intramolecular carbon isotope characterization of Athabasca oil sandss acids in environmental samples. Analytical Chemistry, 84(23), 10419–10425. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac302680y
|
|