Temporal trend evaluation in monitoring programs with high spatial resolution and low temporal resolution using geographically weighted regression models
-
Published:2023-04-10
Issue:5
Volume:195
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-6369
-
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess
Author:
von Brömssen Claudia,Fölster Jens,Eklöf Karin
Abstract
AbstractData from monitoring programs with high spatial resolution but low temporal resolution are often overlooked when assessing temporal trends, as the data structure does not permit the use of established trend analysis methods. However, the data include uniquely detailed information about geographically differentiated temporal trends driven by large-scale influences, such as climate or airborne deposition. In this study, we used geographically weighted regression models, extended with a temporal component, to evaluate linear and nonlinear trends in environmental monitoring data. To improve the results, we tested approaches for station-wise pre-processing of data and for validation of the resulting models. To illustrate the method, we used data on changes in total organic carbon (TOC) obtained in a monitoring program of around 4800 Swedish lakes observed once every 6 years between 2008 and 2021. On applying the methods developed here, we identified nonlinear changes in TOC from consistent negative trends over most of Sweden around 2010 to positive trends during later years in parts of the country.
Funder
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine
Reference54 articles.
1. Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, S., & Charlton, M. (1998a). Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 47, 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00145 2. Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, S., & Charlton, M. (1998b). Spatial nonstationarity and autoregressive models. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 30, 957–973. https://doi.org/10.1068/a300957 3. Carvalho, L., Mackay, E. B., Cardoso, A. C., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Birk, S., Blackstock, K. L., Borics, G., Borja, A., Feld, C. K., Ferreira, M. T., Globevnik, L., Grizzetti, B., Hendry, S., Hering, D., Kelly, M., Langaas, S., Meissner, K., Panagopoulos, Y., Penning, E., … Solheim, A. L. (2019). Protecting and restoring Europe’s waters: An analysis of the future development needs of the Water Framework Directive. Science of the Total Environment, 658, 1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.255 4. Comber, A., Brunsdon, C., Charlton, M., Dong, G., Harris, R., Lu, B., Lü, Y., Murakami, D., Nakaya, T., Wang, Y., & Harris, P. (2023). A route map for successful applications of geographically weighted regression. Geographical Analysis, 55, 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12316 5. da Silva, A. R., & Fotheringham, A. S. (2016). The multiple testing issue in geographically weighted regression. Geographical Analysis, 48, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12084
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|