Sampling efficiency and nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling with different bioaerosol samplers
-
Published:2024-05-25
Issue:6
Volume:196
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-6369
-
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess
Author:
Bøifot Kari Oline,Skogan Gunnar,Dybwad Marius
Abstract
AbstractAerosol microbiome studies have received increased attention as technological advancements have made it possible to dive deeper into the microbial diversity. To enhance biomass collection for metagenomic sequencing, long-term sampling is a common strategy. While the impact of prolonged sampling times on microorganisms’ culturability and viability is well-established, its effect on nucleic acid stability remains less understood but is essential to ensure representative sample collection. This study evaluated four air samplers (SKC BioSampler, SASS3100, Coriolis μ, BioSpot-VIVAS 300-P) against a reference sampler (isopore membrane filters) to identify nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling. Physical sampling efficiencies determined with a fluorescent tracer for three particle sizes (0.8, 1, and 3 μm), revealed high efficiencies (> 80% relative to reference) for BioSampler, SASS3100, and BioSpot-VIVAS for all particle sizes, and for Coriolis with 3 μm particles. Coriolis exhibited lower efficiency for 0.8 μm (7%) and 1 μm (50%) particles. During 2-h sampling with MS2 and Pantoea agglomerans, liquid-based collection with Coriolis and BioSampler showed a decrease in nucleic acid yields for all test conditions. BioSpot-VIVAS displayed reduced sampling efficiency for P. agglomerans compared to MS2 and the other air samplers, while filter-based collection with SASS3100 and isopore membrane filters, showed indications of DNA degradation for 1 μm particles of P. agglomerans after long-term sampling. These findings show that long-term air sampling affects nucleic acid stability in both liquid- and filter-based collection methods. These results highlight bias produced by bioaerosol collection and should be considered when selecting an air sampler and interpreting aerosol microbiome data.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Abd Aziz, A., Lee, K., Park, B., Park, H., Park, K., Choi, I.-G., & Chang, I. S. (2018). Comparative study of the airborne microbial communities and their functional composition in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) under non-extreme and extreme PM2.5 conditions. Atmospheric Environment, 194, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.027 2. Aerosol Devices Inc. (n.d.). BioSpot-VIVAS. Retrieved August 28, 2023, from https://aerosoldevices.com/biospot-vivas/ 3. Archer, S. D. J., Lee, K. C., Caruso, T., Maki, T., Lee, C. K., Cary, S. C., Cowan, D. A., Maestre, F. T., & Pointing, S. B. (2019). Airborne microbial transport limitation to isolated Antarctic soil habitats. Nature Microbiology, 4(6), 925–932. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0370-4 4. Banholzer, N., Zürcher, K., Jent, P., Bittel, P., Furrer, L., Egger, M., Hascher, T., & Fenner, L. (2023). SARS-CoV-2 transmission with and without mask wearing or air cleaners in schools in Switzerland: A modeling study of epidemiological, environmental, and molecular data. PLOS Medicine, 20(5), e1004226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004226 5. Be, N. A., Thissen, J. B., Fofanov, V. Y., Allen, J. E., Rojas, M., Golovko, G., Fofanov, Y., Koshinsky, H., & Jaing, C. J. (2015). Metagenomic analysis of the airborne environment in urban spaces. Microbial Ecology, 69(2), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0517-z
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|