Intuitionistic fuzzy-based entropy weight method–TOPSIS for multi-attribute group decision-making in drilling fluid waste treatment technology selection-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Intuitionistic fuzzy-based entropy weight method–TOPSIS for multi-attribute group decision-making in drilling fluid waste treatment technology selection

Published:2023-09-05 Issue:10 Volume:195 Page:
ISSN:0167-6369
Container-title:Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
language:en
Short-container-title:Environ Monit Assess

Author:

Wu Weidong,Xie Chengyu,Geng Shuai,Lu Honglin,Yao Juan

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-023-11724-6.pdf

Reference66 articles.

1. Adhami, S., Jamshidi-Zanjani, A., & Darban, A. K. (2021). Remediation of oil-based drilling waste using the electrokinetic-Fenton method. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 149, 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.11.018

2. Agarry, S. E., & Ogunleye, O. O. (2012). Factorial designs application to study enhanced bioremediation of soil artificially contaminated with weathered Bonny Light crude oil through biostimulation and bioaugmentation strategy. Journal of Environmental Protection, 03(08), 748–759. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2012.38089

3. Al Zarkani, H. M., Mezher, T., & El-Fadel, M. (2023). Life cycle assessment in the petroleum industry: A systematic framework towards improved environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137196

4. Alves, G. M., & Petri, I. (2021). Microwave remediation of oil-contaminated drill cuttings-A review. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109137

5. An, D., Xi, B., Ren, J., Ren, X., Zhang, W., Wang, Y., & Dong, L. (2018). Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of urban sludge treatment technologies: Method and case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.018