Abstract
AbstractSoil fauna has a crucial importance for the functioning of ecosystems and their conservation. Soil biota has a role in soil formation and distribution of organic matter, and groups like microarthropods can be used as indicators to assess soil quality and are often employed in monitoring programs. In the present study, the QBS-ar index, an index based on the presence/absence of microarthropod groups, was used to assess the level of soil quality in nine different sampling sites in the “Parco Naturale delle Alpi Marittime” and in the “Parco Naturale del Marguareis” (Cuneo, Piedmont). Forest soils, with different degree of management, and open environments (e.g., grasslands and peatlands) were analyzed comparatively, to investigate whether microarthropod fauna might be influenced by management and habitat type.The results show QBS-ar values are significantly higher in woodland soils compared to grasslands and peatlands (p < 0.05). The latter shows no significant difference between each other, although grasslands show a large range of values (108–214). Forest management does not seem to influence QBS-ar values (183–239), showing stable microarthropod communities both in the managed and unmanaged areas. In addition to this, QBS-ar values do not differ significantly in the different forest coenoses, confirming that woodlands have similar index values (p = 0.7).This study confirms that QBS-ar values in natural areas can vary depending on the environment. It is therefore important to consider clustering habitat types before assessing quality classes for QBS-ar values. Finally, sustainable forest management in the study area does not seem to affect significantly soil microarthropod presence in woodland sites.
Funder
Università degli Studi Roma Tre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine
Reference64 articles.
1. Aoki, J. (1977). Relation between fauna of soil mites (Oribatei) and human impacts in four main natural forest regions in Kanagawa Prefecture, Central Japan. Bulletin of the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Yokohama National University, 3, 121–133.
2. Bachelier, G. (1986). La vie animale dans les sol. ORSTOM.
3. Bedano, J. C., Cantú, M. P., & Doucet, M. E. (2006). Soil springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola), symphylans and pauropods (Arthropoda: Myriapoda) under different management systems in agroecosystems of the subhumid Pampa (Argentina). European Journal of Soil Biology, 42, 107–119.
4. Bird, S. B., Coulson, R. N., & Crossley, D. A. (2000). Impacts of silvicultural practices on soil and litter arthropod diversity in a Texas pine plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 131, 65–80.
5. Bird, S. B., Coulson, R. N., & Fisher, R. F. (2004). Changes in soil and litter arthropod abundance following tree harvesting and site preparation in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 202(1–3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.023