Author:
Ollila Laura,Oura Petteri,Karppinen Jaro,Niinimäki Jaakko,Junno Juho-Antti
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Vertebral dimensions may constitute a potential risk factor for degenerative changes in the spine. Previous studies have found a positive association between vertebral height and both type 2 Modic changes and intervertebral disc height loss. Also, vertebral endplate size has been associated with disc degeneration. However, only a few studies have investigated the association between vertebral dimensions and lumbar disc displacement (LDD). This study aimed to investigate the association between vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) and LDD among the general middle-aged Finnish population. We hypothesized that larger vertebral CSA is associated with LDD.
Materials and methods
The study was conducted by using data from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC1966). At the age of 46, a subpopulation of NFBC1966 underwent clinical examinations including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n = 1249). MRI scans were used to measure L4 CSA and evaluate the presence of LDD (bulge, protrusion, and extrusion/sequestration) in the adjacent discs. The association between L4 CSA and LDD was analysed using logistic regression, with adjustment for sex, education, body mass index, leisure-time physical activity, smoking, diet, and L4 height.
Results
Larger L4 CSA was associated with LDD; an increase of 1 cm2 in vertebral CSA elevated the odds of LDD relative to no LDD by 10% (adjusted odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.19). The association was similar among either sex.
Conclusions
Larger L4 vertebral CSA was associated with LDD in our study sample. Even though smaller vertebral size exposes our vertebrae to osteoporotic fractures, it simultaneously seems to protect us from LDD.
Funder
University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference26 articles.
1. Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Rothman SLG, Sze GK (2014) Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J 14(11):2525–2545
2. Jordan JL, Konstantinou K, O’Dowd J (2011) Herniated lumbar disc. Br Med J Clin Evid 2011:1118
3. Heliövaara M (1988) Epidemiology of sciatica and herniated lumbar intervertebral Disc. Publications of the Social insurance institution, Finland. ML:76: 147.
4. Jarvik JJ, Hollingworth W, Heagerty P, Haynor P, Deyo RA (2001) The longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBack) Study: Baseline Data. Spine 26(10):1158–1166
5. Younes M, Béjia I, Aguir Z, Letaief M, Hassen-Zrour S, Touzi M, Bargaoui N (2006) Prevalence and risk factors of disk-related sciatica in an urban population in Tunisia. Joint Bone Spine 73(5):538–542