Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This review provides an overview of the patent literature on posteriorly placed intrapedicular bone anchors. Conventional pedicle screws are the gold standard to create a fixation in the vertebra for spinal fusion surgery but may lack fixation strength, especially in osteoporotic bone. The ageing population demands new bone anchors that have an increased fixation strength, that can be placed safely, and, if necessary, can be removed without damaging the surrounding tissue.
Methods
The patent search was conducted using a classification search in the Espacenet patent database. Only patents with a Cooperative Patent Classification of A61B17/70 or A61B17/7001 concerning spinal positioners and stabilizers were eligible for inclusion. The search query resulted in the identification of 731 patents. Based on preset inclusion criteria, a total of 56 unique patents on different anchoring methods were included, reviewed and categorized in this study.
Results
Five unique fixation methods were identified; (1) anchors that use threading, (2) anchors that utilize a curved path through the vertebra, (3) anchors that (partly) expand, (4) anchors that use cement and (5) anchors that are designed to initiate bone ingrowth. Of the anchor designs included in this study, eight had a corresponding commercial product, six of which were evaluated in clinical trials.
Conclusion
This review provides insights into worldwide patented intrapedicular bone anchors that aim to increase the fixation strength compared to the conventional pedicle screw. The identified anchoring methods and their working principles can be used for clinical decision-making and as a source of inspiration when designing novel bone anchors.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference137 articles.
1. Tukkapuram VR, Kuniyoshi A, Ito M (2019) A review of the historical evolution, biomechanical advantage, clinical applications, and safe insertion techniques of cervical pedicle screw fixation. Spine Surg Relat Res 3(2):126–135. https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2018-0055
2. iData Research (2018) How many spinal fusions are performed each year in the United States?’, iData Research. https://idataresearch.com/how-many-instrumented-spinal-fusions-are-performed-each-year-in-the-united-states/. Accessed 24 Sep 2021
3. Cowan JA Jr, Dimick JB, Wainess R, Upchurch GR Jr, Chandler WF, La Marca F (2006) Changes in utilization of spinal fusion in the united states. Neurosurgery 59(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000243276.09094.5f
4. Kobayashi K, Ando K, Nishida Y, Ishiguro N, Imagama S (2018) Epidemiological trends in spine surgery over 10 years in a multicenter database. Eur Spine J 27(8):1698–1703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5513-4
5. Cortesi PA et al (2017) Epidemiologic and economic burden attributable to first spinal fusion surgery: analysis from an Italian administrative database. Spine 42(18):1398–1404. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002118
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献