Robot-assisted spinal augmentation procedures: is it worth the increased effort?

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Spinal augmentation procedures (SAP) are standard procedures for vertebral compression fractures. Often, SAPs are carried out in a minimally invasive, percutaneous way. Certain anatomic conditions such as small pedicles or kyphotic deformities resulting from a significant collapse of the vertebral body might render the operation more difficult and increase the risk of complications. Thus, robot assistance might be useful to optimize the trajectory and to reduce procedure-associated complications. In this study robot-assisted percutaneous SAPs are compared with conventional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous SAP. Methods A retrospective observational analysis was carried out. Standard demographic parameters were analyzed. Procedural data including radiation dosage records were screened. Biomechanical data were recorded. Cement volumes were analyzed. The precision of the pedicular trajectory was reviewed, and misplaced trajectories were categorized. Procedure-associated complications were analyzed and evaluated for their clinical significance. Results A total of 130 procedures were reviewed, and 94 patients were finally included. Osteoporotic fractures (OF) were the main indication (60.7%; OF 2–44%, OF 4–33%). Demographic parameters and clinically relevant complications were equally distributed between the two groups. Duration of surgery was significantly longer in robot-assisted procedures (p < 0.001). Intraoperative radiation exposure was equally distributed. Injected cement volume was similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in pedicle trajectory deviation. Conclusion The use of robot assistance in SAP seems not to be superior with regard to accuracy, radiation exposure and the rate of complications when compared to fluoroscopy-guided SAP.