Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA as a response and follow-up marker in cancer therapy

Author:

Boonstra Pieter A.,Wind Thijs T.,van Kruchten Michel,Schuuring Ed,Hospers Geke A. P.,van der Wekken Anthonie J.,de Groot Derk-Jan,Schröder Carolien P.,Fehrmann Rudolf S. N.,Reyners Anna K. L.

Abstract

AbstractResponse evaluation for cancer treatment consists primarily of clinical and radiological assessments. In addition, a limited number of serum biomarkers that assess treatment response are available for a small subset of malignancies. Through recent technological innovations, new methods for measuring tumor burden and treatment response are becoming available. By utilization of highly sensitive techniques, tumor-specific mutations in circulating DNA can be detected and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be quantified. These so-called liquid biopsies provide both molecular information about the genomic composition of the tumor and opportunities to evaluate tumor response during therapy. Quantification of tumor-specific mutations in plasma correlates well with tumor burden. Moreover, with liquid biopsies, it is also possible to detect mutations causing secondary resistance during treatment. This review focuses on the clinical utility of ctDNA as a response and follow-up marker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer. Relevant studies were retrieved from a literature search using PubMed database. An overview of the available literature is provided and the relevance of ctDNA as a response marker in anti-cancer therapy for clinical practice is discussed. We conclude that the use of plasma-derived ctDNA is a promising tool for treatment decision-making based on predictive testing, detection of resistance mechanisms, and monitoring tumor response. Necessary steps for translation to daily practice and future perspectives are discussed.

Funder

KWF Kankerbestrijding

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference122 articles.

1. Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., et al. (2009). New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). European Journal of Cancer, 45, 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

2. Chiou, V. L., & Burotto, M. (2015). Pseudoprogression and immune-related response in solid tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33, 3541–3543. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6870.

3. Abbasi, A. W., Westerlaan, H. E., Holtman, G. A., Aden, K. M., van Laar, P. J., & van der Hoorn, A. (2018). Incidence of tumour progression and pseudoprogression in high-grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Neuroradiology, 28, 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-017-0584-x.

4. Chun, Y. S., Vauthey, J. N., Boonsirikamchai, P., Maru, D. M., Kopetz, S., Palavecino, M., et al. (2009). Association of computed tomography morphologic criteria with pathologic response and survival in patients treated with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases. JAMA, 302, 2338–2344. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1755.

5. Peterson, L. M., O'Sullivan, J., Wu, Q. V., Novakova-Jiresova, A., Jenkins, I., Lee, J. H., et al. (2018). Prospective study of serial (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-fluoride PET to predict time to skeletal-related events, time to progression, and survival in patients with bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 59, 1823–1830. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.211102.

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3