Abstract
AbstractDeveloping an authentic understanding of potential users’ needs and translating these into usable categories as an input to research and development is an open problem. It is generally accepted that genuine knowledge of user needs is essential for the creation of any new technology. For assistive robots, however, this knowledge is even more important for two key reasons. First, because the form and function of these technologies is still in the process of negotiation, and second, because assistive robots are ultimately intended for a vulnerable population. In this paper, we describe a number of existing strategies to address this challenge and discuss some of their shortcomings, including a loss of data richness and context, the stereotyping of users and a lack of transparency and traceability. The primary contribution of this paper is a novel Authentic Citations process for capturing needs which aims to address these shortcomings. This process involves a thematic analysis of complex qualitative data to derive robotics needs for older people, which emphasises the retention of the original situated description, or ‘authentic citation’, for ongoing sensitising and grounding at all stages of the research and development cycle, and by various stakeholders. The Authentic Citations process adds additional rigour to a process that can be tacit and opaque and can be used by robotics researchers to analyse and translate qualitative research into usable categories. An additional contribution of this paper is an initial outline of a taxonomy of assistive robotics needs for older people, which contributes to improving the understanding of the user as a situated and complex person and can be used as an input to design.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
National University of Ireland Maynooth
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference82 articles.
1. WHO (2021) “Ageing and health,” World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed Jul 12, 2022
2. OECD.Stat (2022) “OECD Statistics,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2022. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=POPROJ. Accessed Jul 06, 2022
3. Hirvensalo M, Rantanen T, Heikkinen E (2000) Mobility difficulties and physical activity as predictors of mortality and loss of independence in the community-living older population. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(5):493–498
4. Bao XY et al (2019) The association between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional survey among community middle-aged and elderly residents in southern China. Health Qual Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1175-0
5. Jędrzejczyk M, Foryś W, Czapla M, Uchmanowicz I (2022) Relationship between multimorbidity and disability in elderly patients with coexisting frailty syndrome. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063461