Abstract
AbstractAs the Fourth Industrial Revolution advances, socially-situated robots are increasingly not exclusively human-like (i.e. humanoids). They also include socially interactive animaloids. How does this myriad of socially intelligent artefacts emerge as members of a cyber-physical social system in which they are accorded the standing of social robots? And how are we to account for the nature of the universe-of-meaning that emerges from this human-artificial social reality? Utilizing conceptual tools derived from the philosophical fields of phenomenology and “new materialism”, I proffer a theoretic account of robotic sociality. I postulate how robots become members of a cyber-physical social network that is cohabited with sapient humans. Two novel functional constructs are introduced in the process: “the humanoidic” and “the robosphere”. The former illuminates that spontaneous bestowal of sociality on robots is tantamount to a recognition of their social agency. I then demonstrate how this psychical process of the recognition of these humanoidic artefacts instantiates an emergence of a shared human–robot cyber-physical world of relational meaning-making, a robosphere. As a corroboration of the self-manifestation of the robosphere as a concrete social system, it is shown that Industry 4.0 adumbrates Society 4.0, a cybernetic social formation, and the envisioned advance of this into the more technocratic super-smart Society 5.0.
Funder
National Research Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Computer Science,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering,Social Psychology
Reference54 articles.
1. Bartneck C, Belpaeme T, Eyssel F, Takayuki K, Keijsers M, Šabanović S (2020) Human-robot interaction: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
2. Berghofer P (2019) Husserl’s noetics: towards a phenomenological epistemology. J Br Soc Phenomenol 50(2):120–138
3. Coeckelbergh M, Loh J, Funk M, Seibt J, Nørskov M (2018) Envisioning Robots in Society: Power, Politics, and Public Space. In: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2018, Vienna, February 14–17, 2018. Robophilosophy/TRANSOR
4. Coeckelbergh M (2018) Why care about robots? empathy, moral standing, and the language of suffering. Kairos J Philos Sci 20:141–158
5. Colombano S (2003) Robosphere: self-sustaining robotic ecologies as precursors to human planetary exploration. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-6278