Abstract
AbstractLower limb exoskeletons (LLE) are robotic devices developed to assist walk. In the field of healthcare, this technology has been available for almost a decade, yet it still faces important acceptance issues. While LLE were first developed for patients with spinal cord injuries, we expect their use to expand to everyday settings to benefit other populations, namely that of older people with reduced mobility (RM). We propose a qualitative approach to unearth key psychosocial themes on the acceptance of LLE in daily living for older people. The study analyses perceptions of older people with RM, as well as their entourage, including informal and professional caregivers. Using a grounded theory approach we analysed 12 semi-structured interviews with older people with RM; 2 focus groups with informal caregivers, and 2 focus groups with professional caregivers. LLE were introduced to participants through photo-elicitation. Older people with RM believed that LLE would increase their autonomy. They also perceived that using LLE would make them feel less of a burden for their entourage. Beyond these expected benefits, results captured participants’ ambivalence, dependent on their experiences of the ageing process and perceptions on the human–machine interaction. Informal caregivers highlighted that LLE could provide important relief related to the burden of care. Nonetheless, professional caregivers raised the fear of LLE leading to dehumanization of care. While each group had specific concerns on how LLE use would impact their lives, psychosocial considerations played a key role in LLE acceptance.
Funder
Collaborative Research on Science and Society UNIL/EPFL
Université de Lausanne
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Computer Science,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering,Social Psychology
Reference56 articles.
1. Bülow MH, Söderqvist T (2014) Successful ageing: a historical overview and critical analysis of a successful concept. J Aging Stud 31:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.08.009
2. Erikson EH, Erikson JM, Kivnick HQ (1994) Vital involvement in old age. WW Norton & Company
3. Jamieson A, Harper S, Victor C (1997) Critical approaches to ageing and later life. McGraw-Hill Education
4. Katz S (2019) Cultural aging: life course, lifestyle, and senior worlds. University of Toronto Press
5. Turner BS (1996) For Weber: essays on the sociology of fate. Sage
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献