Abstract
AbstractSocial robots, those that exhibit personality and communicate with us using high-level dialogue and natural cues, will soon be part of our daily lives. In this paper, we gather expert opinions from different international workshops exploring ethical, legal, and social (ELS) concerns associated with social robots. In contrast to literature that looks at specific challenges, often from a certain disciplinary angle, our contribution to the literature provides an overview of the ELS discussions in a holistic fashion, shaped by active deliberation with a multitude of experts across four workshops held between 2015 and 2017 held in major international workshops (ERF, NewFriends, JSAI-isAI). It also explores pathways to address the identified challenges. Our contribution is in line with the latest European robot regulatory initiatives but covers an area of research that the latest AI and robot governance strategies have scarcely covered. Specifically, we highlight challenges to the use of social robots from a user perspective, including issues such as privacy, autonomy, and the dehumanization of interactions; or from a worker perspective, including issues such as the possible replacement of jobs through robots. The paper also compiles the recommendations to these ELS issues the experts deem appropriate to mitigate compounding risks. By then contrasting these challenges and solutions with recent AI and robot regulatory strategies, we hope to inform the policy debate and set the scene for further research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Computer Science,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering,Social Psychology
Reference81 articles.
1. Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Autonom Syst 42:143–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X
2. Gupta SK (2015) Six recent trends in robotics and their implications. IEEE Spectrum. https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/home-robots/six-recent-trends-in-robotics-and-their-implications. Accessed 17 Sept 2019
3. Van den Berg B (2016) Mind the air gap. In: Gutwirth S, Leenes R, De Hert P (eds) Data protection on the move: current developments in ICT and privacy/data protection, law, governance and technology. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 1–24
4. Beane M, Orlikowski WJ (2015) What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organ Sci 26:1553–1573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1004
5. Atherton J A, Goodrich M A (2011) Supporting clinicians in robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorder: creating and editing robot animations with full-body motion tracking. In: Human–robot interaction: perspectives and contributions to robotics from the human sciences. Workshop at robotics science and systems, Los Angeles, CA. https://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~mike/mikeg/papers/AthertonFinalRSS2011.pdf Accessed 17 Sept 2019
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献