Gathering Expert Opinions for Social Robots’ Ethical, Legal, and Societal Concerns: Findings from Four International Workshops

Author:

Fosch-Villaronga EduardORCID,Lutz ChristophORCID,Tamò-Larrieux AureliaORCID

Abstract

AbstractSocial robots, those that exhibit personality and communicate with us using high-level dialogue and natural cues, will soon be part of our daily lives. In this paper, we gather expert opinions from different international workshops exploring ethical, legal, and social (ELS) concerns associated with social robots. In contrast to literature that looks at specific challenges, often from a certain disciplinary angle, our contribution to the literature provides an overview of the ELS discussions in a holistic fashion, shaped by active deliberation with a multitude of experts across four workshops held between 2015 and 2017 held in major international workshops (ERF, NewFriends, JSAI-isAI). It also explores pathways to address the identified challenges. Our contribution is in line with the latest European robot regulatory initiatives but covers an area of research that the latest AI and robot governance strategies have scarcely covered. Specifically, we highlight challenges to the use of social robots from a user perspective, including issues such as privacy, autonomy, and the dehumanization of interactions; or from a worker perspective, including issues such as the possible replacement of jobs through robots. The paper also compiles the recommendations to these ELS issues the experts deem appropriate to mitigate compounding risks. By then contrasting these challenges and solutions with recent AI and robot regulatory strategies, we hope to inform the policy debate and set the scene for further research.

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

Horizon 2020

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Computer Science,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering,Social Psychology

Reference81 articles.

1. Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Autonom Syst 42:143–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X

2. Gupta SK (2015) Six recent trends in robotics and their implications. IEEE Spectrum. https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/home-robots/six-recent-trends-in-robotics-and-their-implications. Accessed 17 Sept 2019

3. Van den Berg B (2016) Mind the air gap. In: Gutwirth S, Leenes R, De Hert P (eds) Data protection on the move: current developments in ICT and privacy/data protection, law, governance and technology. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 1–24

4. Beane M, Orlikowski WJ (2015) What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organ Sci 26:1553–1573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1004

5. Atherton J A, Goodrich M A (2011) Supporting clinicians in robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorder: creating and editing robot animations with full-body motion tracking. In: Human–robot interaction: perspectives and contributions to robotics from the human sciences. Workshop at robotics science and systems, Los Angeles, CA. https://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~mike/mikeg/papers/AthertonFinalRSS2011.pdf Accessed 17 Sept 2019

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3