Author:
IJsselhof Rinske,Hintjens Amy,Pelzer Anne,Nieuwenhuis Edward
Abstract
AbstractFor children who show strongly deviant behaviour in the Netherlands, a distinction is made between behavioural problems and psychiatric problems. As a result, two different domains have emerged over time, each with its own legal frameworks and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Consequently, there is no well-organized, coherent system for youth mental health care in the Netherlands. This strong dichotomy raises the question whether patients are being admitted to facilities where they are receiving appropriate care. In addition, referral bias can arise, because the type of complaint with which a young person presents is often dependent on the type of coping of the individual and thus, in turn, the gender of the patient. In this Position Paper, we examined the gender distribution at a youth psychiatric high and intensive care (HIC-Y) and other streams of youth care in the Netherlands to explore possible inequities in access to psychiatric care among children and adolescents. Results show that girls are significantly more likely than boys to be admitted to the HIC-Y for suicidal thoughts, self-harm and emotional dysregulation. In fact, girls account for 80% of all admissions, while boys account for only 20%. In contrast, regional and national reports from youth services and probation show a majority of boys being admitted (56–89%). The way care is organized (lack of cross-domain collaboration and the interplay between gender-dependent coping and exclusion criteria) seems to play a role in the underrepresentation of boys in acute psychiatry and their overrepresentation in secure youth care. Based on our research results, the concern is raised whether boys have a greater chance of undertreatment for psychiatric problems. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying factors that contribute to gender bias in psychiatric admissions, and to develop interventions that promote gender equality in healthcare.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Kleinjan M, Jansen DEMC, van den Essenburg M (2022) The need for a data ecosystem for youth mental health in The Netherlands. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(18):11499
2. Voskes Y, van Melle AL, Widdershoven GAM, van Mierlo T, Bovenberg F, Mulder CL (2021) High and intensive care in psychiatry: a new model for acute inpatient care in the Netherlands. Psychiatr Serv. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800440
3. Addink A, Van der Veldt M. Kijk op JeugdzorgPlus, 10 jaar onderzoek longitudinale effectmonitor jeugdzorgplus. Nederlands Jeugdinstituut. 03-2022
4. van Dam C, Martin L, Jaspers M et al. (2017) JeugdzorgPlus: prevalentie en uitstroom LVB en psychiatrische problematiek. Eindrapport. Praktikon B.V. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/. https://projecten.zonmw.nl/sites/zonmw/files/typo3-migrated-files/Rapport_JZ__prevalentie_en_uitstroom_LVB_en_psychiatrische_problematiek.pdf
5. Wijnhoven L, Creemers D, Vermulst A et al (2014) Randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a depression prevention program (‘Op Volle Kracht’) among adolescent girls with elevated depressive symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42:217–228