Abstract
AbstractThere is growing interest in the role of Social Prescribing (SP) to help promote mental well-being and support individuals with mental health difficulties. Yet, implementation of SP to children and young people (CYP) has proved slow and underdeveloped compared with adult populations. Understanding the barriers and facilitators will help key stakeholders to better embed SP for CYP into practice. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a comprehensive, theoretical-led framework, underpinned by 33 behaviour change theories and 128 constructs, perceived barriers and facilitators to SP were investigated. The sample comprised of 11 Link Workers and 9 individuals involved in facilitating SP with CYP, who took part in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis, and themes were coded under each theoretical domain. Overall, 33 barriers and facilitators for SP were identified across 12 domains of the TDF. Under capability, barriers and facilitators were found for knowledge, skills, memory/attention/decision making processes, and behavioural regulation. For opportunity, barriers and facilitators were found for social/professional influences, as well as environmental context and resources. Finally, for motivation, domains covered included: beliefs about consequences, beliefs about capabilities, optimism, motivations/goals, reinforcement, and emotions. Findings suggest that a wide range of barriers and facilitators affect the implementation of CYP SP to improve mental health and well-being. Interventions which target different domains related to capability, opportunity and motivation should be developed to better facilitate CYP SP.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference50 articles.
1. University of Westminster (2016) Report of the annual social prescribing network conference. London
2. NHS England (2021) Social prescribing. In: https://www.england.nhs.uk/personalisedcare/social-prescribing/. Accessed 1 July 2022
3. Islam MM (2020) Social prescribing—an effort to apply a common knowledge: impelling forces and challenges. Front Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.515469
4. Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM et al (2017) Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open 7(4):e013384
5. Marmot MG (2008) The Marmot review: strategic review of health inequalities in England post 2010. London