Abstract
Abstract
Background
Successful neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could improve the surgical resection rate and radical curability of patients with cervical cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits. Therefore, identifying predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of CD34 and Bcl-2 in the NACT effectiveness of cervical cancer.
Methods
Sixty-seven patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB3, IIA2 or IIB) were classified into two groups based on effective (n = 48) and ineffective (n = 19) response to NACT. Immunohistochemistry was employed to identify CD34 and Bcl-2 expression before and after NACT. We analyzed the associations between the pre-NACT expression of these two biomarkers and the response of NACT. The expression of these two biomarkers before and after NACT was also assessed and compared.
Results
More patients were CD34 positive expression before NACT in effective group compared to ineffective group (p = 0.005). However, no statistically significant difference in Bcl-2 expression before NACT were found between two groups (p = 0.084). In NACT effective group, the expression of both CD34 and Bcl-2 after NACT are down-regulated (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), while there are no statistical differences between the pre- and post-NACT expression of CD34 and Bcl-2 in NACT ineffective group (p = 0.453 and p = 0.317, respectively).
Conclusion
The positive CD34 expression before NACT may serve as a predictive biomarker for NACT of cervical cancer, but the pre-NACT expression of Bcl-2 is not an independent predictor. The down-regulated expression of these two indicators after NACT may indicate effective NACT.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology,General Medicine
Reference38 articles.
1. Bray FI, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424
2. Kokka F, Bryant A, Brockbank E, Powell MEB, Oram D (2015) Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev (4)
3. Landoni F, Sartori E, Maggino T, Zola P, Zanagnolo V, Cosio S, Ferrari F, Piovano E, Gadducci A (2014) Is there a role for postoperative treatment in patients with stage Ib2–IIb cervical cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery? An Italian multicenter retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol 132(3):611–617
4. Hosseini S, Behjati F, Rahimi M, Taheri N, Khorshid HRK, Moghaddam FA, Frouzabadi SG, Karimlou M, Sirati F, Keyhani E (2018) Relationship between PIK3CA amplification and P110α and CD34 tissue expression as angiogenesis markers in iranian women with sporadic breast cancer. Iranian J Pathol 13(4):447–453
5. Bernard U, Patrick N, Michel C, Gérard-Yves P (2004) Microvessel density as a prognostic factor in women with breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Can Res 64(9):2941
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献