Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
App-based treatment of urgency (UUI) and mixed (MUI) urinary incontinence has proved to be effective. To further improve treatment, it will be beneficial to analyze baseline and treatment-related factors that are associated with satisfaction.
Methods
A secondary analysis was conducted of data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing an app for UUI or MUI treatment, encompassing 98 women for whom there was long-term treatment satisfaction data. All participants completed a short-term (15 weeks) and a long-term (15 months) follow-up questionnaire after being given access to treatment. The outcome was a 3-item question on current treatment satisfaction at the long-term follow-up. Factors potentially associated with the outcome were analyzed using the chi-square test, Student’s t test or logistic regression.
Results
At the long-term follow-up, 58% of the women were satisfied with the treatment. The most important baseline variable associated with satisfaction was incontinence-related quality of life (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) − Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module) (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.58–0.97). Short-term follow-up variables associated with long-term treatment satisfaction were improvement in the ability to endure urgency (OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.43–13.12), and confidence in pelvic floor contraction ability (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.04–6.82).
Conclusion
App-based treatment for UUI and MUI may be an alternative first-line treatment that is satisfactory to many women over the long-term. Furthermore, short-term treatment that focuses on improving the ability to endure urgency, and confidence in pelvic floor contraction ability, can also be recommended for long-term satisfaction.
Funder
Visare Norr, Northern County Councils
Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse
Insamlingsstiftelsen, Foundations managed by Umea University
Umea University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine
Reference26 articles.
1. Cardozo, L, Rovner, E, Wagg, A, Wein, A, Abrams, P (eds) (2023) Incontinence 7th Edition. Bristol UK: ICI-ICS. International Continence Society. (ISBN: 978-0-9569607-4-0)
2. Coyne KS, Zhou Z, Thompson C, Versi E (2003) The impact on health-related quality of life of stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence. BJU Int 92(7):731–735
3. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S (2000) A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. J Clin Epidemiol. 53(11):1150–7
4. Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L (2017) Urinary incontinence in women: a review. JAMA 318(16):1592–1604
5. Wadensten T, Nystrom E, Franzen K, Lindam A, Wasteson E, Samuelsson E (2021) A mobile app for self-management of urgency and mixed urinary incontinence in women: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 23(4):e19439
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献