Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the accuracy of preoperative sonographic staging in patients with primary invasive breast cancer.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively kept service database of patients with newly diagnosed, unifocal, cT1-3, invasive breast cancer. All patients were diagnosed at a single center institution between January 2013 and December 2021. Clinical T stage was assessed preoperatively by ultrasound and correlated with the definite postoperative pathologic T stage. Demographics, clinical and pathological characteristics were collected. Factors influencing accuracy, over- and underdiagnosis of sonographic staging were analyzed with multivariable regression analysis.
Results
A total of 2478 patients were included in the analysis. Median patients’ age was 65 years. 1577 patients (63.6%) had clinical T1 stage, 864 (34.9%) T2 and 37 (1.5%) T3 stage. The overall accuracy of sonography and histology was 76.5% (n = 1896), overestimation was observed in 9.1% (n = 225) of all cases, while underestimation occurred in 14.4% (n = 357) of all cases. Accuracy increased when clinical tumor stage cT was higher (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.10–1.38, p ≤ 0.001). The highest accuracy was seen for patients with T2 stage (82.8%). The accuracy was lower in Luminal B tumors compared to Luminal A tumors (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59–0.87, p ≤ 0.001). We could not find any association between sonographic accuracy in HER2 positive patients, and demographic characteristics, or tumor-related factors.
Conclusion
Our unicentric study showed a high accuracy of sonography in predicting T stage, especially for tumors with clinical T2 stage. Tumor stage and biological tumor factors do affect the accuracy of sonographic staging.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer (last assessed 2/21/2024) World Health Organization - Breast Cancer Report. In: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer (last assessed 2/21/2024)
2. Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S et al (2019) Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 30:1194–1220. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz173
3. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumors. Eighth Edition, Union for International Cancer Control
4. Recommendations (2023) www.ago-online.de (accessed 02/21/2024) AGO Breast Committee. Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer
5. Stein RG, Wollschläger D, Kreienberg R et al (2016) The impact of breast cancer biological subtyping on tumor size assessment by ultrasound and mammography—a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 6543 primary breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 16:459. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2426-7