Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to evaluate the level of psychological distress for women with
breech compared to cephalic presentation. We hypothesized, that women with breech presentation have higher levels of depression, stress and anxiety. Secondary objectives were to analyze potential demographic risk factors and comorbidity of psychological distress in breech pregnancy.
Methods
The breech study group was formed by 379 women with breech presentation. A sample of 128 women with cephalic presentation was recruited during routine clinical care. Depression, anxiety and stress symptoms were ascertained by means of the Depression–Anxiety–Stress-Score (DASS)-21 questionnaire. Categorial data was analyzed with Chi-square or exact test, continuous data with unpaired t test or Mann–Whitney U test. Demographic risk factors were identified using a binary logistic regression model.
Results
Prevalence of psychological distress among women with breech was not higher compared to those of other pregnant women. Symptomatic depression, anxiety and stress affected 5.8%, 14.5% and 11.9% of women with breech, respectively. Decreasing age was identified as a risk factor for anxiety (p = 0.006). Multiparity increased risk for depression (p = 0.001), for anxiety (p = 0.026) and for perinatal stress (p = 0.010). More than 80% of women with depressive symptoms had comorbidities of psychological distress.
Conclusions
Breech presentation compared to cephalic presentation was not associated with higher levels of psychological distress. However, breech pregnancies are affected by symptoms of potential mental disorder. Multiparous women and younger women may need additional support and would benefit from a standardized screening tool for the assessment of perinatal psychological distress.
Clinical trial registration
Ethical approval (EA2/241/18) was granted by the Ethics Commission of the Charité University Hospital on the 23.01.2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03827226).
Funder
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine
Reference64 articles.
1. Macharey G, Gissler M, Rahkonen L, Ulander VM, Vaisanen-Tommiska M, Nuutila M, Heinonen S (2017) Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors-a nationwide population based cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(4):833–838
2. Noli SA, Baini I, Parazzini F, Mauri PA, Vignali M, Gerli S, Favilli A, Cipriani S (2019) Preterm birth, low gestational age, low birth weight, parity, and other determinants of breech presentation: results from a large retrospective population-based study. Biomed Res Int 2019:9581439
3. Ekeus C, Norman M, Aberg K, Winberg S, Stolt K, Aronsson A (2019) Vaginal breech delivery at term and neonatal morbidity and mortality—a population-based cohort study in Sweden. J Maternal Fetal Neonat Med 32(2):265–270
4. Fonseca A, Silva R, Rato I, Neves AR, Peixoto C, Ferraz Z, Ramalho I, Carocha A, Felix N, Valdoleiros S et al (2017) Breech presentation: vaginal versus cesarean delivery, which intervention leads to the best outcomes? Acta Med Port 30(6):479–484
5. Lee HC, El-Sayed YY, Gould JB (2008) Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(1):59e51-59e58
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献